Abstract
Lay explanations for juvenile delinquency given by Australian adolescents from either collectivist or individualist cultural backgrounds were examined. After controlling for socioeconomic and demographic variables, differences were found between the groups, with the individualistic group tending to emphasize more individual-oriented explanations. These results are consistent with previous work on culture and attributional style.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 459-463 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2002 |