Defensible Territory for Entity Realism

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    15 Citations (Scopus)


    In the face of argument to the contrary, it is shown that there is defensible middle ground available for entity realism, between the extremes of scientific realism and empiricist antirealism. Cartwright's ([1983]) earlier argument for defensible middle ground between these extremes, which depended crucially on the viability of an underdeveloped distinction between inference to the best explanation (IBE) and inference to the most probable cause (IPC), is examined and its defects are identified. The relationship between IBE and IPC is clarified and a revised version of Cartwright's argument for defensible middle ground, which is free of the identified defects, is presented.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)701-722
    Number of pages22
    JournalBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Defensible Territory for Entity Realism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this