Designs and decisions

The creation of informal measures for assessing speech production in children

Nicole Limbrick, Jane McCormack, Sharynne McLeod

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
79 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) frequently assess children's speech to diagnose and identify areas of difficulty, then determine appropriate intervention goals. Formal measures are available for assessment; however, many SLPs use informal measures within clinical practice. The purpose of this two-part mixed methods study was to describe informal measures created to assess children's speech. Study 1 involved a systematic review of 39 informal measures identified via journal database and internet searches, scanning of reference lists, and submission by SLPs and researchers. The measures were reviewed in terms of their conceptualization (content and format) and operationalization (evaluation and validation). Common conceptual features included assessment of consonant singletons, single words, computer format, and picture-naming. Few measures provided information addressing operational criteria; in particular, they lacked evaluation of their effectiveness. Study 2 involved an inductive thematic analysis of journal entries from eight creators of informal measures that explored key considerations in the development process. Informal measures were created due to the absence of measures which were sufficiently comprehensive and culturally appropriate, plus a desire to incorporate technology. Considerations in the creation of informal measures included sourcing research and existing measures to inform the measures' development, maximizing children's engagement, and utility. SLPs must be cautious when using informal measures due to their lack of operationalization. However, these measures often address SLPs' needs and so operationalization of informal measures would be beneficial for the profession.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)296-311
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Language
Child Development
Speech-language Pathologists
Speech Production
Internet
Research Personnel
Pathologists
Databases
Technology
Operationalization
Research
Evaluation
Consonant
Data Base
Systematic Review
Thematic Analysis
Picture Naming
Sourcing
Conceptualization
Journal Entries

Grant Number

  • FT0990588

Cite this

@article{b7feb6259e0e44c9bab51c5849eabf8e,
title = "Designs and decisions: The creation of informal measures for assessing speech production in children",
abstract = "Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) frequently assess children's speech to diagnose and identify areas of difficulty, then determine appropriate intervention goals. Formal measures are available for assessment; however, many SLPs use informal measures within clinical practice. The purpose of this two-part mixed methods study was to describe informal measures created to assess children's speech. Study 1 involved a systematic review of 39 informal measures identified via journal database and internet searches, scanning of reference lists, and submission by SLPs and researchers. The measures were reviewed in terms of their conceptualization (content and format) and operationalization (evaluation and validation). Common conceptual features included assessment of consonant singletons, single words, computer format, and picture-naming. Few measures provided information addressing operational criteria; in particular, they lacked evaluation of their effectiveness. Study 2 involved an inductive thematic analysis of journal entries from eight creators of informal measures that explored key considerations in the development process. Informal measures were created due to the absence of measures which were sufficiently comprehensive and culturally appropriate, plus a desire to incorporate technology. Considerations in the creation of informal measures included sourcing research and existing measures to inform the measures' development, maximizing children's engagement, and utility. SLPs must be cautious when using informal measures due to their lack of operationalization. However, these measures often address SLPs' needs and so operationalization of informal measures would be beneficial for the profession.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Assessment, Children, Communication, Early childhood, Education, Language, Speech",
author = "Nicole Limbrick and Jane McCormack and Sharynne McLeod",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = June, 2013; Journal title (773t) = International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. ISSNs: 1754-9507;",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.3109/17549507.2013.770552",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "296--311",
journal = "Advances in Speech Language Pathology",
issn = "1441-7049",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare USA",
number = "3",

}

Designs and decisions : The creation of informal measures for assessing speech production in children. / Limbrick, Nicole; McCormack, Jane; McLeod, Sharynne.

In: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Vol. 15, No. 3, 06.2013, p. 296-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Designs and decisions

T2 - The creation of informal measures for assessing speech production in children

AU - Limbrick, Nicole

AU - McCormack, Jane

AU - McLeod, Sharynne

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = June, 2013; Journal title (773t) = International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. ISSNs: 1754-9507;

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) frequently assess children's speech to diagnose and identify areas of difficulty, then determine appropriate intervention goals. Formal measures are available for assessment; however, many SLPs use informal measures within clinical practice. The purpose of this two-part mixed methods study was to describe informal measures created to assess children's speech. Study 1 involved a systematic review of 39 informal measures identified via journal database and internet searches, scanning of reference lists, and submission by SLPs and researchers. The measures were reviewed in terms of their conceptualization (content and format) and operationalization (evaluation and validation). Common conceptual features included assessment of consonant singletons, single words, computer format, and picture-naming. Few measures provided information addressing operational criteria; in particular, they lacked evaluation of their effectiveness. Study 2 involved an inductive thematic analysis of journal entries from eight creators of informal measures that explored key considerations in the development process. Informal measures were created due to the absence of measures which were sufficiently comprehensive and culturally appropriate, plus a desire to incorporate technology. Considerations in the creation of informal measures included sourcing research and existing measures to inform the measures' development, maximizing children's engagement, and utility. SLPs must be cautious when using informal measures due to their lack of operationalization. However, these measures often address SLPs' needs and so operationalization of informal measures would be beneficial for the profession.

AB - Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) frequently assess children's speech to diagnose and identify areas of difficulty, then determine appropriate intervention goals. Formal measures are available for assessment; however, many SLPs use informal measures within clinical practice. The purpose of this two-part mixed methods study was to describe informal measures created to assess children's speech. Study 1 involved a systematic review of 39 informal measures identified via journal database and internet searches, scanning of reference lists, and submission by SLPs and researchers. The measures were reviewed in terms of their conceptualization (content and format) and operationalization (evaluation and validation). Common conceptual features included assessment of consonant singletons, single words, computer format, and picture-naming. Few measures provided information addressing operational criteria; in particular, they lacked evaluation of their effectiveness. Study 2 involved an inductive thematic analysis of journal entries from eight creators of informal measures that explored key considerations in the development process. Informal measures were created due to the absence of measures which were sufficiently comprehensive and culturally appropriate, plus a desire to incorporate technology. Considerations in the creation of informal measures included sourcing research and existing measures to inform the measures' development, maximizing children's engagement, and utility. SLPs must be cautious when using informal measures due to their lack of operationalization. However, these measures often address SLPs' needs and so operationalization of informal measures would be beneficial for the profession.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Assessment

KW - Children

KW - Communication

KW - Early childhood

KW - Education

KW - Language

KW - Speech

U2 - 10.3109/17549507.2013.770552

DO - 10.3109/17549507.2013.770552

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 296

EP - 311

JO - Advances in Speech Language Pathology

JF - Advances in Speech Language Pathology

SN - 1441-7049

IS - 3

ER -