Detecting deception in police investigations: Implications for false confessions

Deborah Bradford, Jane Goodman-Delahunty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A great deal of psychological research suggests that fact finders are unable to successfully distinguish truths from lies at levels significantly greater than chance. This article addresses the shortcomings in deception detection accuracy in forensic settings and focuses on the implications for the elicitation of false confessions and the assessment of confession evidence. In particular, we review the empirical psychological literature on detecting deception while highlighting the limitations on performance accuracy in forensic contexts. The consequences of these performance errors are discussed with reference to police interviews and the elicitation of potentially unreliable confessions. Next, this article outlines the conditions under which innocent people may falsely confess and considers the psychological factors that may mediate an individual's decision to make a false confession. The authors argue that false confessions are very persuasive and are difficult to discern from truthful confessions elicited in an investigative context. The implications for assessing the credibility of confessions and possible directions for future research are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-118
Number of pages14
JournalPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Police
Deception
police
Psychology
psychological factors
credibility
performance
interview
Interviews
evidence
Research
literature

Cite this

@article{62cabfc829784de4b7314252f01ae36d,
title = "Detecting deception in police investigations: Implications for false confessions",
abstract = "A great deal of psychological research suggests that fact finders are unable to successfully distinguish truths from lies at levels significantly greater than chance. This article addresses the shortcomings in deception detection accuracy in forensic settings and focuses on the implications for the elicitation of false confessions and the assessment of confession evidence. In particular, we review the empirical psychological literature on detecting deception while highlighting the limitations on performance accuracy in forensic contexts. The consequences of these performance errors are discussed with reference to police interviews and the elicitation of potentially unreliable confessions. Next, this article outlines the conditions under which innocent people may falsely confess and considers the psychological factors that may mediate an individual's decision to make a false confession. The authors argue that false confessions are very persuasive and are difficult to discern from truthful confessions elicited in an investigative context. The implications for assessing the credibility of confessions and possible directions for future research are discussed.",
keywords = "Confessions and false confessions, Deception detection, Police interviewing",
author = "Deborah Bradford and Jane Goodman-Delahunty",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Psychiatry Psychology and Law. ISSNs: 1321-8719;",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/13218710701873932",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "105--118",
journal = "Psychiatry, Psychology and Law",
issn = "1321-8719",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Detecting deception in police investigations : Implications for false confessions. / Bradford, Deborah; Goodman-Delahunty, Jane.

In: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2008, p. 105-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detecting deception in police investigations

T2 - Implications for false confessions

AU - Bradford, Deborah

AU - Goodman-Delahunty, Jane

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Psychiatry Psychology and Law. ISSNs: 1321-8719;

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - A great deal of psychological research suggests that fact finders are unable to successfully distinguish truths from lies at levels significantly greater than chance. This article addresses the shortcomings in deception detection accuracy in forensic settings and focuses on the implications for the elicitation of false confessions and the assessment of confession evidence. In particular, we review the empirical psychological literature on detecting deception while highlighting the limitations on performance accuracy in forensic contexts. The consequences of these performance errors are discussed with reference to police interviews and the elicitation of potentially unreliable confessions. Next, this article outlines the conditions under which innocent people may falsely confess and considers the psychological factors that may mediate an individual's decision to make a false confession. The authors argue that false confessions are very persuasive and are difficult to discern from truthful confessions elicited in an investigative context. The implications for assessing the credibility of confessions and possible directions for future research are discussed.

AB - A great deal of psychological research suggests that fact finders are unable to successfully distinguish truths from lies at levels significantly greater than chance. This article addresses the shortcomings in deception detection accuracy in forensic settings and focuses on the implications for the elicitation of false confessions and the assessment of confession evidence. In particular, we review the empirical psychological literature on detecting deception while highlighting the limitations on performance accuracy in forensic contexts. The consequences of these performance errors are discussed with reference to police interviews and the elicitation of potentially unreliable confessions. Next, this article outlines the conditions under which innocent people may falsely confess and considers the psychological factors that may mediate an individual's decision to make a false confession. The authors argue that false confessions are very persuasive and are difficult to discern from truthful confessions elicited in an investigative context. The implications for assessing the credibility of confessions and possible directions for future research are discussed.

KW - Confessions and false confessions

KW - Deception detection

KW - Police interviewing

U2 - 10.1080/13218710701873932

DO - 10.1080/13218710701873932

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 105

EP - 118

JO - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

JF - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

SN - 1321-8719

IS - 1

ER -