TY - JOUR
T1 - Differences in dehydration tolerance affect survival of white clover (Trifolium repens) and lucerne (Medicago sativa) during a drying cycle
AU - Norton, Mark R.
AU - Li, Guangdi D.
AU - Xu, Binbin
AU - Price, Andrew
AU - Tyndall, Peter
AU - Hayes, Richard C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 CSIRO.
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - There is very little robust, experimentally based knowledge comparing
drought tolerance of one legume species with another. Dehydration
tolerance and plant survival of the perennial legumes white clover (Trifolium repens L., considered quite sensitive to drought) and lucerne (Medicago sativa
L., considered drought tolerant) were compared in a drying cycle
experiment conducted in pots in a glasshouse, with the deep rooting of
lucerne constrained. White clover used more soil water, drying the pots
to a final soil gravimetric water content (θg) of 4.7%, compared with 8.3% in lucerne pots. Rates of water use were also different: white clover used 0.47% of θg
per day and lucerne 0.3%. The more conservative water use allowed
lucerne to survive for longer into the drying cycle than white clover.
Lucerne partitioned more of its total dry matter into root growth and
had much higher root:shoot ratios than white clover. Leaf/stolon
elongation is one of the first plant processes to cease as water deficit
increases; however, elongation was greater in white clover than lucerne
at the beginning of the drying cycle, and this trend continued until
lower soil water contents were reached. Conversely, leaf senescence
generally commenced at quite high levels of water stress and progressed
more rapidly to complete senescence in white clover than in lucerne.
Lucerne retained tissue relative water content at a higher level than
white clover, with final minimum values of 25% and 13.6%, respectively.
In lucerne, 50% mortality was observed at θg of 9%, compared
with 6% in white clover, albeit with greater variability. In conclusion,
lucerne maintained a higher relative water content than white clover
even though it endured the drying cycle for longer and without access to
water at depth, evidence of its superior dehydration avoidance and
better adaptation to dry conditions. However, white clover was more able
to extract water from surface soil layers. This study provides valuable
insight into the adaptive traits of both species and identifies some
traits that might be useful in the quest to improve white clover
adaptation.
AB - There is very little robust, experimentally based knowledge comparing
drought tolerance of one legume species with another. Dehydration
tolerance and plant survival of the perennial legumes white clover (Trifolium repens L., considered quite sensitive to drought) and lucerne (Medicago sativa
L., considered drought tolerant) were compared in a drying cycle
experiment conducted in pots in a glasshouse, with the deep rooting of
lucerne constrained. White clover used more soil water, drying the pots
to a final soil gravimetric water content (θg) of 4.7%, compared with 8.3% in lucerne pots. Rates of water use were also different: white clover used 0.47% of θg
per day and lucerne 0.3%. The more conservative water use allowed
lucerne to survive for longer into the drying cycle than white clover.
Lucerne partitioned more of its total dry matter into root growth and
had much higher root:shoot ratios than white clover. Leaf/stolon
elongation is one of the first plant processes to cease as water deficit
increases; however, elongation was greater in white clover than lucerne
at the beginning of the drying cycle, and this trend continued until
lower soil water contents were reached. Conversely, leaf senescence
generally commenced at quite high levels of water stress and progressed
more rapidly to complete senescence in white clover than in lucerne.
Lucerne retained tissue relative water content at a higher level than
white clover, with final minimum values of 25% and 13.6%, respectively.
In lucerne, 50% mortality was observed at θg of 9%, compared
with 6% in white clover, albeit with greater variability. In conclusion,
lucerne maintained a higher relative water content than white clover
even though it endured the drying cycle for longer and without access to
water at depth, evidence of its superior dehydration avoidance and
better adaptation to dry conditions. However, white clover was more able
to extract water from surface soil layers. This study provides valuable
insight into the adaptive traits of both species and identifies some
traits that might be useful in the quest to improve white clover
adaptation.
KW - dehydration avoidance
KW - drought
KW - leaf elongation
KW - leaf senescence
KW - root:shoot ratio
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104003576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104003576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1071/CP20300
DO - 10.1071/CP20300
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85104003576
SN - 1836-0947
VL - 72
SP - 723
EP - 730
JO - Crop and Pasture Science
JF - Crop and Pasture Science
IS - 9
ER -