Directions for social research to underpin improved groundwater management

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Improvements in groundwater management require strategies to change human behaviour, yet there has been limited social research in the broad arena of groundwater management. This paper provides a critical review of the small but expanding literature on that topic to identify future directions for social researchers. Comprehensive search methods identified almost three hundred potentially relevant publications, which were sorted thematically and assessed in terms of their theoretical underpinning and the evidence used to support key findings. This process enabled the authors to identify a small number of high quality publications and to identify future research opportunities. The latter includes analysing how concepts of risk and sustainable yield are constructed differently by stakeholders, especially related to divisive issues concerning coal seam gas developments and reforms that reduce irrigation allocations; how governance arrangements can be improved to achieve more effective collaborative management of groundwater, especially if managed aquifer recharge is to be more widely implemented in rural agricultural contexts; and the role that trust and social norms can play in changing groundwater use practices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223-231
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Hydrology
Volume448-449
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

groundwater
human behavior
coal seam
recharge
stakeholder
irrigation
aquifer
gas
norm
allocation
method

Cite this

@article{5d3181c8fa3e413e83969493e5cbcd69,
title = "Directions for social research to underpin improved groundwater management",
abstract = "Improvements in groundwater management require strategies to change human behaviour, yet there has been limited social research in the broad arena of groundwater management. This paper provides a critical review of the small but expanding literature on that topic to identify future directions for social researchers. Comprehensive search methods identified almost three hundred potentially relevant publications, which were sorted thematically and assessed in terms of their theoretical underpinning and the evidence used to support key findings. This process enabled the authors to identify a small number of high quality publications and to identify future research opportunities. The latter includes analysing how concepts of risk and sustainable yield are constructed differently by stakeholders, especially related to divisive issues concerning coal seam gas developments and reforms that reduce irrigation allocations; how governance arrangements can be improved to achieve more effective collaborative management of groundwater, especially if managed aquifer recharge is to be more widely implemented in rural agricultural contexts; and the role that trust and social norms can play in changing groundwater use practices.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Capacity building, Collaborative management, Community-based NRM, Groundwater governance, Landholder decision-making, Stakeholder engagement",
author = "Michael Mitchell and Allan Curtis and Emily Sharp and Emily Mendham",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = July, 2012; Journal title (773t) = Journal of Hydrology. ISSNs: 0022-1694;",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.056",
language = "English",
volume = "448-449",
pages = "223--231",
journal = "Journal of Hydrology",
issn = "0022-1694",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Directions for social research to underpin improved groundwater management. / Mitchell, Michael; Curtis, Allan; Sharp, Emily; Mendham, Emily.

In: Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 448-449, 07.2012, p. 223-231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Directions for social research to underpin improved groundwater management

AU - Mitchell, Michael

AU - Curtis, Allan

AU - Sharp, Emily

AU - Mendham, Emily

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = July, 2012; Journal title (773t) = Journal of Hydrology. ISSNs: 0022-1694;

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Improvements in groundwater management require strategies to change human behaviour, yet there has been limited social research in the broad arena of groundwater management. This paper provides a critical review of the small but expanding literature on that topic to identify future directions for social researchers. Comprehensive search methods identified almost three hundred potentially relevant publications, which were sorted thematically and assessed in terms of their theoretical underpinning and the evidence used to support key findings. This process enabled the authors to identify a small number of high quality publications and to identify future research opportunities. The latter includes analysing how concepts of risk and sustainable yield are constructed differently by stakeholders, especially related to divisive issues concerning coal seam gas developments and reforms that reduce irrigation allocations; how governance arrangements can be improved to achieve more effective collaborative management of groundwater, especially if managed aquifer recharge is to be more widely implemented in rural agricultural contexts; and the role that trust and social norms can play in changing groundwater use practices.

AB - Improvements in groundwater management require strategies to change human behaviour, yet there has been limited social research in the broad arena of groundwater management. This paper provides a critical review of the small but expanding literature on that topic to identify future directions for social researchers. Comprehensive search methods identified almost three hundred potentially relevant publications, which were sorted thematically and assessed in terms of their theoretical underpinning and the evidence used to support key findings. This process enabled the authors to identify a small number of high quality publications and to identify future research opportunities. The latter includes analysing how concepts of risk and sustainable yield are constructed differently by stakeholders, especially related to divisive issues concerning coal seam gas developments and reforms that reduce irrigation allocations; how governance arrangements can be improved to achieve more effective collaborative management of groundwater, especially if managed aquifer recharge is to be more widely implemented in rural agricultural contexts; and the role that trust and social norms can play in changing groundwater use practices.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Capacity building

KW - Collaborative management

KW - Community-based NRM

KW - Groundwater governance

KW - Landholder decision-making

KW - Stakeholder engagement

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.056

DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.056

M3 - Article

VL - 448-449

SP - 223

EP - 231

JO - Journal of Hydrology

JF - Journal of Hydrology

SN - 0022-1694

ER -