Discussion forums: A misnomer? Examining lurkers, engagement, and academic achievement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Discussion forums are often touted as maximising student participation and learning but concerns around engagement counter any perceived benefits. Often participation is the measure of engagement, and students who do not post are deemed unengaged. To further examine engagement and forums as learning communities, we used analytic data from 270 students enrolled in two online psychology subjects using social network analysis and interviewed 22 students. Both subjects’ forums had greater egalitarian triads, indicative of reciprocal relationships. Furthermore, both active posters and lurkers had a mix of grade bands indicating that some lurkers still achieved academically. Lurking was a key qualitative theme along with checking for assessment information and intimidation. For both subjects, students were engaged with the forums, and differences in connectivity were consistent with the different subject content. However, forum activity indicated that these forums were more like subscription services than communities of practice. We propose that forums can be transformed into dynamic teaching spaces through understanding the multidimensionality of engagement, setting the expectation and tone of the forum as a safe place, and enhancing the platforms so visible indicators show that posts have been read or consumed. We further propose that students who engage but do not post be called quiet participants.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-54
Number of pages18
JournalAustralasian Journal of Educational Technology
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jul 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Discussion forums: A misnomer? Examining lurkers, engagement, and academic achievement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this