Dividing harm

Esben Overland

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)
    9 Downloads (Pure)


    In this paper I argue that mere causal contribution to harm is morally significant on two counts: a) innocent aggressors have a duty to bear additional costs to help protect their potential victims, as compared to the duty innocent bystanders are expected to bear, and correspondingly; b) it is permissible to use more force against innocent aggressors, as used in self-defense and defense of others, than innocent bystanders. The paper has two parts. First I aim to demonstrate the intuitive plausibility of this proposal and what I call 'the asymmetrical fair share procedure.' According to this procedure, innocent aggressors have a duty to take on a fair share of the harm if dividing it is possible, and a fair share of the risk of being harmed if redistribution of harm is impossible. In the second part, I develop a contractual account explaining why mere contribution is morally significant.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)547-566
    Number of pages20
    JournalJournal of Moral Philosophy
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Dividing harm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this