DNA and the changing face of justice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Focusing on the impact of DNA evidence in jury trials, evidence for the existence of multiple posited forms of the 'CSI effect' is reviewed. The most popular version of the effect, that it produces unrealistic expectations of the prosecution and thus results in unwarranted acquittals, remains unsupported. The converse effect, that unwarranted convictions result from the overweighting of DNA expert evidence, has received some support from archival analyses, a substantial field study, and several simulation studies. The precise factors that produce these trends are yet not well-understood. Future research should examine the source of these findings, explore ways to assist jurors in according DNA evidence appropriate probative weight, and take into account the influence of jury deliberations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-106
Number of pages10
JournalAustralian Journal of Forensic Sciences
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Social Justice
DNA
Weights and Measures

Cite this

@article{c21442e1d85a4268b917a1fd8c7320a4,
title = "DNA and the changing face of justice",
abstract = "Focusing on the impact of DNA evidence in jury trials, evidence for the existence of multiple posited forms of the 'CSI effect' is reviewed. The most popular version of the effect, that it produces unrealistic expectations of the prosecution and thus results in unwarranted acquittals, remains unsupported. The converse effect, that unwarranted convictions result from the overweighting of DNA expert evidence, has received some support from archival analyses, a substantial field study, and several simulation studies. The precise factors that produce these trends are yet not well-understood. Future research should examine the source of these findings, explore ways to assist jurors in according DNA evidence appropriate probative weight, and take into account the influence of jury deliberations.",
keywords = "CSI effect, DNA, Expert evidence, Forensic, Jury, Probabilistic",
author = "Jane Goodman-Delahunty and D Tait",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. ISSNs: 0045-0618;",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1080/00450610609410636",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "97--106",
journal = "Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences",
issn = "0045-0618",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

DNA and the changing face of justice. / Goodman-Delahunty, Jane; Tait, D.

In: Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2006, p. 97-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - DNA and the changing face of justice

AU - Goodman-Delahunty, Jane

AU - Tait, D

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. ISSNs: 0045-0618;

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Focusing on the impact of DNA evidence in jury trials, evidence for the existence of multiple posited forms of the 'CSI effect' is reviewed. The most popular version of the effect, that it produces unrealistic expectations of the prosecution and thus results in unwarranted acquittals, remains unsupported. The converse effect, that unwarranted convictions result from the overweighting of DNA expert evidence, has received some support from archival analyses, a substantial field study, and several simulation studies. The precise factors that produce these trends are yet not well-understood. Future research should examine the source of these findings, explore ways to assist jurors in according DNA evidence appropriate probative weight, and take into account the influence of jury deliberations.

AB - Focusing on the impact of DNA evidence in jury trials, evidence for the existence of multiple posited forms of the 'CSI effect' is reviewed. The most popular version of the effect, that it produces unrealistic expectations of the prosecution and thus results in unwarranted acquittals, remains unsupported. The converse effect, that unwarranted convictions result from the overweighting of DNA expert evidence, has received some support from archival analyses, a substantial field study, and several simulation studies. The precise factors that produce these trends are yet not well-understood. Future research should examine the source of these findings, explore ways to assist jurors in according DNA evidence appropriate probative weight, and take into account the influence of jury deliberations.

KW - CSI effect

KW - DNA

KW - Expert evidence

KW - Forensic

KW - Jury

KW - Probabilistic

U2 - 10.1080/00450610609410636

DO - 10.1080/00450610609410636

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 97

EP - 106

JO - Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

JF - Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

SN - 0045-0618

IS - 2

ER -