Do boys need different remedial reading instruction from girls?

Lisa Limbrick, Kevin Wheldall, Alison Madelaine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent inquiries into the underachievement of boys in reading have called into question whether they require different forms of reading instruction from girls. Anumber of reading programs and initiatives have been developed to address this issue, including programs based on increasing boys’ motivation, improvingbehaviour, embracing the use of computers, and so forth. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that effective remedial reading instruction isequally effective for boys as well as girls. The sample comprised 398 low-progress students (239 boys, 159 girls) in Years 5 and 6, who attended an off-site tutorial centre for two school terms between the years 2005 and 2010. All boys and girls in the sample participated in the Schoolwise Program, a non-categorical,empirically-based reading program, for three hours daily. Participants were assessed pre- and post- intervention on five reading and related measures. Both boys and girls made substantial gains, analyses of covariance confirming that their rates of progress were very similar. Small effect sizes were also reported. It isconcluded that boys and girls do not require different forms of reading instruction if both are provided with effective systematic remedial reading instruction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalAustralian Journal of Learning Difficulties
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Do boys need different remedial reading instruction from girls?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this