Do boys need different remedial reading instruction from girls?

Lisa Limbrick, Kevin Wheldall, Alison Madelaine

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)


    Recent inquiries into the underachievement of boys in reading have called into question whether they require different forms of reading instruction from girls. Anumber of reading programs and initiatives have been developed to address this issue, including programs based on increasing boys' motivation, improvingbehaviour, embracing the use of computers, and so forth. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that effective remedial reading instruction isequally effective for boys as well as girls. The sample comprised 398 low-progress students (239 boys, 159 girls) in Years 5 and 6, who attended an off-site tutorial centre for two school terms between the years 2005 and 2010. All boys and girls in the sample participated in the Schoolwise Program, a non-categorical,empirically-based reading program, for three hours daily. Participants were assessed pre- and post- intervention on five reading and related measures. Both boys and girls made substantial gains, analyses of covariance confirming that their rates of progress were very similar. Small effect sizes were also reported. It isconcluded that boys and girls do not require different forms of reading instruction if both are provided with effective systematic remedial reading instruction.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-15
    Number of pages15
    JournalAustralian Journal of Learning Difficulties
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2012


    Dive into the research topics of 'Do boys need different remedial reading instruction from girls?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
    • Lee Mills Encouragement Award

      Limbrick, Lisa (Recipient), 2011

      Prize: AwardExternal award

    Cite this