TY - JOUR
T1 - Does research using qualitative methods (grounded theory, ethnography, and phenomenology) have more impact?
AU - Jamali, Hamid R.
N1 - Includes bibliographical references
PY - 2018/11/10
Y1 - 2018/11/10
N2 - In spite of the increasing use of qualitative research methods in library and information studies, it is unclear whether using qualitative methods (grounded theory, ethnography, and phenomenology) results in an above average impact in library and information science (LIS). Articles using any of the three qualitative methods published from 2003 to 2013 and indexed in Web of Science in the category of “Information Science & Library Science” (N = 299) were studied. The number of citations and Mendeley readers for each article was compared to the other articles published in the same journal and same volume using mean normalised rank (rank-1/articles-1). The results showed no statistically significant difference between the citation rates of qualitative articles with those of other articles. Qualitative articles on average had a smaller Mendeley readership than the other articles did and the difference was statistically significant. Given the increasing interest in qualitative methods, it is suggested that LIS schools in their education programs and journals in their editorial policies should put more emphasis on issues related to the rigour of qualitative research.
AB - In spite of the increasing use of qualitative research methods in library and information studies, it is unclear whether using qualitative methods (grounded theory, ethnography, and phenomenology) results in an above average impact in library and information science (LIS). Articles using any of the three qualitative methods published from 2003 to 2013 and indexed in Web of Science in the category of “Information Science & Library Science” (N = 299) were studied. The number of citations and Mendeley readers for each article was compared to the other articles published in the same journal and same volume using mean normalised rank (rank-1/articles-1). The results showed no statistically significant difference between the citation rates of qualitative articles with those of other articles. Qualitative articles on average had a smaller Mendeley readership than the other articles did and the difference was statistically significant. Given the increasing interest in qualitative methods, it is suggested that LIS schools in their education programs and journals in their editorial policies should put more emphasis on issues related to the rigour of qualitative research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053124236&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053124236&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lisr.2018.09.002
DO - 10.1016/j.lisr.2018.09.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85053124236
SN - 0740-8188
VL - 40
SP - 201
EP - 207
JO - Library and Information Science Research
JF - Library and Information Science Research
IS - 3-4
ER -