TY - JOUR
T1 - Eating disorders, body dysmorphic disorder, and body image pathology in female Australian models
AU - Collison, James
AU - Barnier, Ellise
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Australian Psychological Society
PY - 2021/3/11
Y1 - 2021/3/11
N2 - Objective: Female models are commonly viewed as “at-risk” for eating and body image disorders. However, the existing literature is sparse and provides inconsistent evidence. It subsequently fails to decipher whether models are truly at any greater risk for body image disorders than non-models. Such discrepancies may exist due to differences in population, method, and assessment, particularly where previous studies have focused on evaluative body image that mostly reflect normative body image concerns. This study sought to examine body image disturbance, dysmorphic appearance concern, the rate of probable eating disorders (EDs) and body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), depression, anxiety, stress, self-esteem, and functional impairment in models. Method: A sample of 100 female models was compared to 100 age-matched tertiary students on measures of ED symptoms, body dysmorphic symptoms, psychopathology, and functional impairment. Results: Ninety-two models met referral criteria for an ED and 26 for non-weight related BDD, compared to 53 (ED) and 2 (BDD) students. Models also reported greater body image disturbance, dysmorphic appearance concern, depression, stress, functional impairment, and ED symptoms, but equivalent degrees of anxiety, self-esteem, and home-based functional impairment. Conclusions: Not only are female models at-risk of the physical effects of maintaining a clinically underweight body, but models are at greater risk of developing body image-related psychological illnesses, experiencing emotional stressors, and facing functional impairment than their non-model peers.
AB - Objective: Female models are commonly viewed as “at-risk” for eating and body image disorders. However, the existing literature is sparse and provides inconsistent evidence. It subsequently fails to decipher whether models are truly at any greater risk for body image disorders than non-models. Such discrepancies may exist due to differences in population, method, and assessment, particularly where previous studies have focused on evaluative body image that mostly reflect normative body image concerns. This study sought to examine body image disturbance, dysmorphic appearance concern, the rate of probable eating disorders (EDs) and body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), depression, anxiety, stress, self-esteem, and functional impairment in models. Method: A sample of 100 female models was compared to 100 age-matched tertiary students on measures of ED symptoms, body dysmorphic symptoms, psychopathology, and functional impairment. Results: Ninety-two models met referral criteria for an ED and 26 for non-weight related BDD, compared to 53 (ED) and 2 (BDD) students. Models also reported greater body image disturbance, dysmorphic appearance concern, depression, stress, functional impairment, and ED symptoms, but equivalent degrees of anxiety, self-esteem, and home-based functional impairment. Conclusions: Not only are female models at-risk of the physical effects of maintaining a clinically underweight body, but models are at greater risk of developing body image-related psychological illnesses, experiencing emotional stressors, and facing functional impairment than their non-model peers.
KW - body dysmorphic disorder
KW - body image
KW - eating disorders
KW - female models
KW - models
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079055296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85079055296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/cp.12208
DO - 10.1111/cp.12208
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85079055296
SN - 1328-4207
VL - 24
SP - 155
EP - 165
JO - Clinical Psychologist
JF - Clinical Psychologist
IS - 2
ER -