Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quantitative PCR (qPCR) aims to measure the DNA or RNA concentration in diagnostic and biological samples based on the quantification cycle (Cq) value observed in the amplification curves. Results of qPCR experiments are regularly calculated as if all assays are 100% efficient or reported as just Cq, ΔCq, or ΔΔCq values.
CONTENTS: When the reaction shows specific amplification, it should be deemed to be positive, regardless of the observed Cq. Because the Cq is highly dependent on amplification efficiency that can vary among targets and samples, accurate calculation of the target quantity and relative gene expression requires that the actual amplification efficiency be taken into account in the analysis and reports. PCR efficiency is frequently derived from standard curves, but this approach is affected by dilution errors and hampered by properties of the standard and the diluent. These factors affect accurate quantification of clinical and biological samples used in diagnostic applications and collected in challenging conditions. PCR efficiencies determined from individual amplification curves avoid these confounders. To obtain unbiased efficiency-corrected results, we recommend absolute quantification with a single undiluted calibrator with a known target concentration and efficiency values derived from the amplification curves of the calibrator and the unknown samples.
SUMMARY: For meaningful diagnostics or biological interpretation, the reported results of qPCR experiments should be efficiency corrected. To avoid ambiguity, the Minimal Information for Publications on Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines checklist should be extended to require the methods that were used (1) to determine the PCR efficiency and (2) to calculate the reported target quantity and relative gene expression value.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 829-842 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Clinical Chemistry |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01 Jun 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Efficiency correction is required for accurate quantitative PCR analysis and reporting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.-
Detection of Ureaplasma diversum in the upper airways of Australian feedlot cattle
Barnewall, R., Marsh, I., Cusack, P., Galea, F., Sales, N. & Quinn, J., Jun 2023, In: Australian Veterinary Journal. 101, 6, p. 254-257 4 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile3 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)83 Downloads (Pure) -
Efficiency-corrected PCR quantification for identification of prevalence and load of respiratory disease-causing agents in feedlot cattle
Marsh, I., Barnewall, R., Williams, T., Cusack, P., Sales, N., Galea, F., Szentirmay, A., Ruijter, J. M., van den Hoff, M. J. B. & Quinn, J., 22 Mar 2023.Research output: Other contribution to conference › Abstract
-
Monitoring health and welfare using emerging diagnostic technologies in the beef feedlot sector
Quinn, J., Marsh, I., Cusack, P., Barnewall, R., Williams, T., Sales, N. & Amidy, M., 08 Jun 2023, North Sydney, NSW: Meat and Livestock Australia Ltd. 99 p.Research output: Book/Report › Commissioned report (public)
Open AccessFile
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver