Equity and excellence are not mutually exclusive: A discussion of academic standards in an era of widening participation

G. Whiteford, M. Shah, C.S. Nair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Social inclusion policies in the higher education sector are implemented to ensure that all people - irrespective of socioeconomic background - have rights of access and the opportunities needed to participate and, ultimately, succeed. In Australia, and in other countries such as the UK, the USA, New Zealand and South Africa such policies are reflective of a commitment to the government's social inclusion agenda particularly aimed at improving access and participation of those from disadvantaged and low-socioeconomic backgrounds. Such a commitment arrives at an historic moment in countries like Australia and the UK when there is a concurrent national renewal of quality assurance in higher education with a particular focus on academic standards. The purpose of this paper is to stimulate discussion on the extent to which a national social inclusion agenda may impact academic standards and student outcomes. Design/methodology/approach: The authors argue that contemporary trends such as increasing student diversity, changing pattern of student participation, differentiated levels of preparedness for tertiary education and new modes of learning, will continue to grow and will not in and of themselves affect academic standards. The authors contend that it is the responsibility of higher education institutions to respond proactively to the diverse needs of students whilst ensuring that academic standards are maintained. In this way, the fulfilment of an essentially transformative moral purpose in higher education may also be achieved. Findings: The evidence presented in this paper from various contexts suggests that a social inclusion agenda related to increasing the equity of access and participation of disadvantaged students does not have a negative impact on academic standards and outcomes. However, such commitment to widening participation requires the active "buy in" of a number of stakeholders. Originality/value: The paper shows that institutions of higher education need to plan for and actively support the development of environments in which all people can realise their potential and are provided with the knowledge and skill sets they in turn will require in order to contribute to society. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)299-310
Number of pages12
JournalQuality Assurance in Education
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

equity
participation
inclusion
education
commitment
student
Africa policy
quality assurance
New Zealand
stakeholder
responsibility
methodology
trend
learning
evidence
Values
Group

Cite this

@article{21c91d2ea74846f28794b906a1cd0f90,
title = "Equity and excellence are not mutually exclusive: A discussion of academic standards in an era of widening participation",
abstract = "Purpose: Social inclusion policies in the higher education sector are implemented to ensure that all people - irrespective of socioeconomic background - have rights of access and the opportunities needed to participate and, ultimately, succeed. In Australia, and in other countries such as the UK, the USA, New Zealand and South Africa such policies are reflective of a commitment to the government's social inclusion agenda particularly aimed at improving access and participation of those from disadvantaged and low-socioeconomic backgrounds. Such a commitment arrives at an historic moment in countries like Australia and the UK when there is a concurrent national renewal of quality assurance in higher education with a particular focus on academic standards. The purpose of this paper is to stimulate discussion on the extent to which a national social inclusion agenda may impact academic standards and student outcomes. Design/methodology/approach: The authors argue that contemporary trends such as increasing student diversity, changing pattern of student participation, differentiated levels of preparedness for tertiary education and new modes of learning, will continue to grow and will not in and of themselves affect academic standards. The authors contend that it is the responsibility of higher education institutions to respond proactively to the diverse needs of students whilst ensuring that academic standards are maintained. In this way, the fulfilment of an essentially transformative moral purpose in higher education may also be achieved. Findings: The evidence presented in this paper from various contexts suggests that a social inclusion agenda related to increasing the equity of access and participation of disadvantaged students does not have a negative impact on academic standards and outcomes. However, such commitment to widening participation requires the active {"}buy in{"} of a number of stakeholders. Originality/value: The paper shows that institutions of higher education need to plan for and actively support the development of environments in which all people can realise their potential and are provided with the knowledge and skill sets they in turn will require in order to contribute to society. {\circledC} Emerald Group Publishing Limited.",
keywords = "Academic standards, Australia, Disadvantaged groups, Government policy, Higher education, Social inclusion, United Kingdom",
author = "G. Whiteford and M. Shah and C.S. Nair",
note = "Cited By :20 Export Date: 18 March 2019 Correspondence Address: Shah, M.; The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia; email: shah_mahsood@hotmail.com",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1108/QAE-Apr-2012-0020",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "299--310",
journal = "Quality Assurance in Education",
issn = "0968-4883",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Limited",
number = "3",

}

Equity and excellence are not mutually exclusive: A discussion of academic standards in an era of widening participation. / Whiteford, G.; Shah, M.; Nair, C.S.

In: Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2013, p. 299-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equity and excellence are not mutually exclusive: A discussion of academic standards in an era of widening participation

AU - Whiteford, G.

AU - Shah, M.

AU - Nair, C.S.

N1 - Cited By :20 Export Date: 18 March 2019 Correspondence Address: Shah, M.; The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia; email: shah_mahsood@hotmail.com

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Purpose: Social inclusion policies in the higher education sector are implemented to ensure that all people - irrespective of socioeconomic background - have rights of access and the opportunities needed to participate and, ultimately, succeed. In Australia, and in other countries such as the UK, the USA, New Zealand and South Africa such policies are reflective of a commitment to the government's social inclusion agenda particularly aimed at improving access and participation of those from disadvantaged and low-socioeconomic backgrounds. Such a commitment arrives at an historic moment in countries like Australia and the UK when there is a concurrent national renewal of quality assurance in higher education with a particular focus on academic standards. The purpose of this paper is to stimulate discussion on the extent to which a national social inclusion agenda may impact academic standards and student outcomes. Design/methodology/approach: The authors argue that contemporary trends such as increasing student diversity, changing pattern of student participation, differentiated levels of preparedness for tertiary education and new modes of learning, will continue to grow and will not in and of themselves affect academic standards. The authors contend that it is the responsibility of higher education institutions to respond proactively to the diverse needs of students whilst ensuring that academic standards are maintained. In this way, the fulfilment of an essentially transformative moral purpose in higher education may also be achieved. Findings: The evidence presented in this paper from various contexts suggests that a social inclusion agenda related to increasing the equity of access and participation of disadvantaged students does not have a negative impact on academic standards and outcomes. However, such commitment to widening participation requires the active "buy in" of a number of stakeholders. Originality/value: The paper shows that institutions of higher education need to plan for and actively support the development of environments in which all people can realise their potential and are provided with the knowledge and skill sets they in turn will require in order to contribute to society. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

AB - Purpose: Social inclusion policies in the higher education sector are implemented to ensure that all people - irrespective of socioeconomic background - have rights of access and the opportunities needed to participate and, ultimately, succeed. In Australia, and in other countries such as the UK, the USA, New Zealand and South Africa such policies are reflective of a commitment to the government's social inclusion agenda particularly aimed at improving access and participation of those from disadvantaged and low-socioeconomic backgrounds. Such a commitment arrives at an historic moment in countries like Australia and the UK when there is a concurrent national renewal of quality assurance in higher education with a particular focus on academic standards. The purpose of this paper is to stimulate discussion on the extent to which a national social inclusion agenda may impact academic standards and student outcomes. Design/methodology/approach: The authors argue that contemporary trends such as increasing student diversity, changing pattern of student participation, differentiated levels of preparedness for tertiary education and new modes of learning, will continue to grow and will not in and of themselves affect academic standards. The authors contend that it is the responsibility of higher education institutions to respond proactively to the diverse needs of students whilst ensuring that academic standards are maintained. In this way, the fulfilment of an essentially transformative moral purpose in higher education may also be achieved. Findings: The evidence presented in this paper from various contexts suggests that a social inclusion agenda related to increasing the equity of access and participation of disadvantaged students does not have a negative impact on academic standards and outcomes. However, such commitment to widening participation requires the active "buy in" of a number of stakeholders. Originality/value: The paper shows that institutions of higher education need to plan for and actively support the development of environments in which all people can realise their potential and are provided with the knowledge and skill sets they in turn will require in order to contribute to society. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

KW - Academic standards

KW - Australia

KW - Disadvantaged groups

KW - Government policy

KW - Higher education

KW - Social inclusion

KW - United Kingdom

U2 - 10.1108/QAE-Apr-2012-0020

DO - 10.1108/QAE-Apr-2012-0020

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 299

EP - 310

JO - Quality Assurance in Education

JF - Quality Assurance in Education

SN - 0968-4883

IS - 3

ER -