Essential differences between high and low performers' thinking about graphically oriented numeracy items

Carmel Diezmann, Tom Lowrie, Nahum Kozak

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperConference paper

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study compared the thinking of five high performing and five low performing primary students on a set of graphically-oriented numeracy items. Generally, their thinking differed in four ways. First, high performers drew on existing knowledge and skills, which low performers appeared to lack. Second, high performers used multiple cues to complete tasks, whereas low performers worked from a single cue or overlooked cues. Third, high performers used simple solution procedures correctly; in contrast, low performers used more mentally demanding procedures with limited success. Finally, high performers were more knowledgeable about everyday graphics than low performers
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMERGA 30
Subtitle of host publicationMathematics: Essential research, essential practice
Place of PublicationAdelaide, Australia
PublisherMERGA Inc
Pages226-235
Number of pages10
Volume1
ISBN (Electronic)9781920846138
Publication statusPublished - 2007
EventAnnual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA) - Hobart, TAS, Australia
Duration: 02 Jul 200706 Jul 2007

Conference

ConferenceAnnual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA)
CountryAustralia
Period02/07/0706/07/07

Fingerprint

lack
knowledge
student

Cite this

Diezmann, C., Lowrie, T., & Kozak, N. (2007). Essential differences between high and low performers' thinking about graphically oriented numeracy items. In MERGA 30: Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice (Vol. 1, pp. 226-235). Adelaide, Australia: MERGA Inc.
Diezmann, Carmel ; Lowrie, Tom ; Kozak, Nahum. / Essential differences between high and low performers' thinking about graphically oriented numeracy items. MERGA 30: Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice. Vol. 1 Adelaide, Australia : MERGA Inc, 2007. pp. 226-235
@inproceedings{ddd02820f2934384b6e6b50bcdadbe1e,
title = "Essential differences between high and low performers' thinking about graphically oriented numeracy items",
abstract = "This study compared the thinking of five high performing and five low performing primary students on a set of graphically-oriented numeracy items. Generally, their thinking differed in four ways. First, high performers drew on existing knowledge and skills, which low performers appeared to lack. Second, high performers used multiple cues to complete tasks, whereas low performers worked from a single cue or overlooked cues. Third, high performers used simple solution procedures correctly; in contrast, low performers used more mentally demanding procedures with limited success. Finally, high performers were more knowledgeable about everyday graphics than low performers",
keywords = "Open access version available, Graphicacy, High and low performers, Mathematical representations, Numeracy, Primary school",
author = "Carmel Diezmann and Tom Lowrie and Nahum Kozak",
note = "Imported on 03 May 2017 - DigiTool details were: publisher = Adelaide, Australia: MERGA Inc, 2007. editor/s (773b) = Watson, J , Beswick, K ; Event dates (773o) = 2-6 July 2007; Parent title (773t) = Annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA).",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "226--235",
booktitle = "MERGA 30",
publisher = "MERGA Inc",

}

Diezmann, C, Lowrie, T & Kozak, N 2007, Essential differences between high and low performers' thinking about graphically oriented numeracy items. in MERGA 30: Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice. vol. 1, MERGA Inc, Adelaide, Australia, pp. 226-235, Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA), Australia, 02/07/07.

Essential differences between high and low performers' thinking about graphically oriented numeracy items. / Diezmann, Carmel; Lowrie, Tom; Kozak, Nahum.

MERGA 30: Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice. Vol. 1 Adelaide, Australia : MERGA Inc, 2007. p. 226-235.

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperConference paper

TY - GEN

T1 - Essential differences between high and low performers' thinking about graphically oriented numeracy items

AU - Diezmann, Carmel

AU - Lowrie, Tom

AU - Kozak, Nahum

N1 - Imported on 03 May 2017 - DigiTool details were: publisher = Adelaide, Australia: MERGA Inc, 2007. editor/s (773b) = Watson, J , Beswick, K ; Event dates (773o) = 2-6 July 2007; Parent title (773t) = Annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA).

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This study compared the thinking of five high performing and five low performing primary students on a set of graphically-oriented numeracy items. Generally, their thinking differed in four ways. First, high performers drew on existing knowledge and skills, which low performers appeared to lack. Second, high performers used multiple cues to complete tasks, whereas low performers worked from a single cue or overlooked cues. Third, high performers used simple solution procedures correctly; in contrast, low performers used more mentally demanding procedures with limited success. Finally, high performers were more knowledgeable about everyday graphics than low performers

AB - This study compared the thinking of five high performing and five low performing primary students on a set of graphically-oriented numeracy items. Generally, their thinking differed in four ways. First, high performers drew on existing knowledge and skills, which low performers appeared to lack. Second, high performers used multiple cues to complete tasks, whereas low performers worked from a single cue or overlooked cues. Third, high performers used simple solution procedures correctly; in contrast, low performers used more mentally demanding procedures with limited success. Finally, high performers were more knowledgeable about everyday graphics than low performers

KW - Open access version available

KW - Graphicacy

KW - High and low performers

KW - Mathematical representations

KW - Numeracy

KW - Primary school

M3 - Conference paper

VL - 1

SP - 226

EP - 235

BT - MERGA 30

PB - MERGA Inc

CY - Adelaide, Australia

ER -

Diezmann C, Lowrie T, Kozak N. Essential differences between high and low performers' thinking about graphically oriented numeracy items. In MERGA 30: Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice. Vol. 1. Adelaide, Australia: MERGA Inc. 2007. p. 226-235