Evaluation of gender differences in exercise adherence for low back pain: Case reviews and survey

Chelsea T. Noon, Ezekiel U. Nwose, Louise Breheny

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study has aims to determine if men have a higher adherence to physiotherapy exercises for low back pain (LBP) than women or vice versa; and the factors prohibiting a patient’s adherence to exercises and how these differ between men and women. Material and methods: Two methods that included patients’ exercise journal and questionnaire survey were used. First, a clinical observational study in designated physiotherapy practices whereby three patients’ exercise journals and physiotherapists were collected for case reviews. Second, a cross-sectional survey of community using closed-ended questionnaire. The statistical tool Microsoft Excel Analysis Tool PAK and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) Student’s paired t-test was used for data analysis. Results: Men and women showed higher levels of adherence to different perspectives of adherence. The main limiting factors for all individuals to prescribed exercises were health and time. Males and females showed some differences in other limiting factors, but there is no significant difference between genders. Conclusions: Overall, it will be inductive fallacy of generalisation to claim that a specific gender is less adherent to physiotherapy exercises for LBP. The observation of insignificant gender differences in some limiting factors provides additional piece of information to physiotherapists that when aiming to achieve or improve adherence to physiotherapy exercises, each patient should be treated on a case-by-case basis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-55
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Physiotherapy
Volume21
Issue number1
Early online dateMay 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Exercise
Physical Therapists
Patient Compliance
Surveys and Questionnaires
Observational Studies
Analysis of Variance
Cross-Sectional Studies
Observation
Students
Health

Cite this

@article{872a11e48a454bdca9766588610133f8,
title = "Evaluation of gender differences in exercise adherence for low back pain: Case reviews and survey",
abstract = "This study has aims to determine if men have a higher adherence to physiotherapy exercises for low back pain (LBP) than women or vice versa; and the factors prohibiting a patient’s adherence to exercises and how these differ between men and women. Material and methods: Two methods that included patients’ exercise journal and questionnaire survey were used. First, a clinical observational study in designated physiotherapy practices whereby three patients’ exercise journals and physiotherapists were collected for case reviews. Second, a cross-sectional survey of community using closed-ended questionnaire. The statistical tool Microsoft Excel Analysis Tool PAK and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) Student’s paired t-test was used for data analysis. Results: Men and women showed higher levels of adherence to different perspectives of adherence. The main limiting factors for all individuals to prescribed exercises were health and time. Males and females showed some differences in other limiting factors, but there is no significant difference between genders. Conclusions: Overall, it will be inductive fallacy of generalisation to claim that a specific gender is less adherent to physiotherapy exercises for LBP. The observation of insignificant gender differences in some limiting factors provides additional piece of information to physiotherapists that when aiming to achieve or improve adherence to physiotherapy exercises, each patient should be treated on a case-by-case basis.",
keywords = "Adherence evaluation, gender, limiting factors, low back pain, physiotherapy exercise prescription",
author = "Noon, {Chelsea T.} and Nwose, {Ezekiel U.} and Louise Breheny",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/21679169.2018.1468815",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "49--55",
journal = "Advances in Physiotherapy",
issn = "1403-8196",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare USA",
number = "1",

}

Evaluation of gender differences in exercise adherence for low back pain : Case reviews and survey. / Noon, Chelsea T.; Nwose, Ezekiel U.; Breheny, Louise.

In: European Journal of Physiotherapy, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2019, p. 49-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of gender differences in exercise adherence for low back pain

T2 - Case reviews and survey

AU - Noon, Chelsea T.

AU - Nwose, Ezekiel U.

AU - Breheny, Louise

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This study has aims to determine if men have a higher adherence to physiotherapy exercises for low back pain (LBP) than women or vice versa; and the factors prohibiting a patient’s adherence to exercises and how these differ between men and women. Material and methods: Two methods that included patients’ exercise journal and questionnaire survey were used. First, a clinical observational study in designated physiotherapy practices whereby three patients’ exercise journals and physiotherapists were collected for case reviews. Second, a cross-sectional survey of community using closed-ended questionnaire. The statistical tool Microsoft Excel Analysis Tool PAK and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) Student’s paired t-test was used for data analysis. Results: Men and women showed higher levels of adherence to different perspectives of adherence. The main limiting factors for all individuals to prescribed exercises were health and time. Males and females showed some differences in other limiting factors, but there is no significant difference between genders. Conclusions: Overall, it will be inductive fallacy of generalisation to claim that a specific gender is less adherent to physiotherapy exercises for LBP. The observation of insignificant gender differences in some limiting factors provides additional piece of information to physiotherapists that when aiming to achieve or improve adherence to physiotherapy exercises, each patient should be treated on a case-by-case basis.

AB - This study has aims to determine if men have a higher adherence to physiotherapy exercises for low back pain (LBP) than women or vice versa; and the factors prohibiting a patient’s adherence to exercises and how these differ between men and women. Material and methods: Two methods that included patients’ exercise journal and questionnaire survey were used. First, a clinical observational study in designated physiotherapy practices whereby three patients’ exercise journals and physiotherapists were collected for case reviews. Second, a cross-sectional survey of community using closed-ended questionnaire. The statistical tool Microsoft Excel Analysis Tool PAK and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) Student’s paired t-test was used for data analysis. Results: Men and women showed higher levels of adherence to different perspectives of adherence. The main limiting factors for all individuals to prescribed exercises were health and time. Males and females showed some differences in other limiting factors, but there is no significant difference between genders. Conclusions: Overall, it will be inductive fallacy of generalisation to claim that a specific gender is less adherent to physiotherapy exercises for LBP. The observation of insignificant gender differences in some limiting factors provides additional piece of information to physiotherapists that when aiming to achieve or improve adherence to physiotherapy exercises, each patient should be treated on a case-by-case basis.

KW - Adherence evaluation

KW - gender

KW - limiting factors

KW - low back pain

KW - physiotherapy exercise prescription

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046469056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046469056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/21679169.2018.1468815

DO - 10.1080/21679169.2018.1468815

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046469056

VL - 21

SP - 49

EP - 55

JO - Advances in Physiotherapy

JF - Advances in Physiotherapy

SN - 1403-8196

IS - 1

ER -