Evaluation of the bifactor structure of the dispositional hope scale

Rapson Gomez, Suzanne Mclaren, Mersey Sharp, Cara Smith, Kate Hearn, Leah Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Dispositional Hope Scale (DHS; Snyder et al., 1991) is composed of items assessing an individual's perception of his or her agency and pathways. This study examined support for the bifactor structure and relation of the factors in this model with depressive symptoms. It also examined cross-gender measurement invariance for the bifactor model. A community sample of 413 women and 257 men completed the DHS. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated more support for the bifactor model than the 1- and 2-factor models. Results also indicated full measurement invariance across gender for the bifactor and the 2-factor models. The general and the specific agency factors, but not the specific pathways factor, correlated with depressive symptoms. The better support for the bifactor model suggests that ideally hope has to be measured and examined by factors reflecting high covariance for agency and pathways, and also factors reflecting unique variances for agency and pathways. The support for full cross-gender measurement invariance indicated that there are no differences in measurement and scaling properties for the DHS across ratings provided by women and men, and therefore the DHS ratings can be scored in the same way for women and men.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-199
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Personality Assessment
Volume97
Issue number2
Early online date04 Aug 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 04 Mar 2015

Fingerprint

Hope
Depression
Statistical Factor Analysis

Cite this

Gomez, Rapson ; Mclaren, Suzanne ; Sharp, Mersey ; Smith, Cara ; Hearn, Kate ; Turner, Leah. / Evaluation of the bifactor structure of the dispositional hope scale. In: Journal of Personality Assessment. 2015 ; Vol. 97, No. 2. pp. 191-199.
@article{1c3abfd1dab047a3b4e172f2a98fdc34,
title = "Evaluation of the bifactor structure of the dispositional hope scale",
abstract = "The Dispositional Hope Scale (DHS; Snyder et al., 1991) is composed of items assessing an individual's perception of his or her agency and pathways. This study examined support for the bifactor structure and relation of the factors in this model with depressive symptoms. It also examined cross-gender measurement invariance for the bifactor model. A community sample of 413 women and 257 men completed the DHS. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated more support for the bifactor model than the 1- and 2-factor models. Results also indicated full measurement invariance across gender for the bifactor and the 2-factor models. The general and the specific agency factors, but not the specific pathways factor, correlated with depressive symptoms. The better support for the bifactor model suggests that ideally hope has to be measured and examined by factors reflecting high covariance for agency and pathways, and also factors reflecting unique variances for agency and pathways. The support for full cross-gender measurement invariance indicated that there are no differences in measurement and scaling properties for the DHS across ratings provided by women and men, and therefore the DHS ratings can be scored in the same way for women and men.",
author = "Rapson Gomez and Suzanne Mclaren and Mersey Sharp and Cara Smith and Kate Hearn and Leah Turner",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/00223891.2014.938158",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "191--199",
journal = "Journal of Personality Assessment",
issn = "0022-3891",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Evaluation of the bifactor structure of the dispositional hope scale. / Gomez, Rapson; Mclaren, Suzanne; Sharp, Mersey; Smith, Cara; Hearn, Kate; Turner, Leah.

In: Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 97, No. 2, 04.03.2015, p. 191-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the bifactor structure of the dispositional hope scale

AU - Gomez, Rapson

AU - Mclaren, Suzanne

AU - Sharp, Mersey

AU - Smith, Cara

AU - Hearn, Kate

AU - Turner, Leah

PY - 2015/3/4

Y1 - 2015/3/4

N2 - The Dispositional Hope Scale (DHS; Snyder et al., 1991) is composed of items assessing an individual's perception of his or her agency and pathways. This study examined support for the bifactor structure and relation of the factors in this model with depressive symptoms. It also examined cross-gender measurement invariance for the bifactor model. A community sample of 413 women and 257 men completed the DHS. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated more support for the bifactor model than the 1- and 2-factor models. Results also indicated full measurement invariance across gender for the bifactor and the 2-factor models. The general and the specific agency factors, but not the specific pathways factor, correlated with depressive symptoms. The better support for the bifactor model suggests that ideally hope has to be measured and examined by factors reflecting high covariance for agency and pathways, and also factors reflecting unique variances for agency and pathways. The support for full cross-gender measurement invariance indicated that there are no differences in measurement and scaling properties for the DHS across ratings provided by women and men, and therefore the DHS ratings can be scored in the same way for women and men.

AB - The Dispositional Hope Scale (DHS; Snyder et al., 1991) is composed of items assessing an individual's perception of his or her agency and pathways. This study examined support for the bifactor structure and relation of the factors in this model with depressive symptoms. It also examined cross-gender measurement invariance for the bifactor model. A community sample of 413 women and 257 men completed the DHS. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated more support for the bifactor model than the 1- and 2-factor models. Results also indicated full measurement invariance across gender for the bifactor and the 2-factor models. The general and the specific agency factors, but not the specific pathways factor, correlated with depressive symptoms. The better support for the bifactor model suggests that ideally hope has to be measured and examined by factors reflecting high covariance for agency and pathways, and also factors reflecting unique variances for agency and pathways. The support for full cross-gender measurement invariance indicated that there are no differences in measurement and scaling properties for the DHS across ratings provided by women and men, and therefore the DHS ratings can be scored in the same way for women and men.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923530758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923530758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00223891.2014.938158

DO - 10.1080/00223891.2014.938158

M3 - Article

C2 - 25090370

AN - SCOPUS:84923530758

VL - 97

SP - 191

EP - 199

JO - Journal of Personality Assessment

JF - Journal of Personality Assessment

SN - 0022-3891

IS - 2

ER -