TY - JOUR
T1 - Experiences with a hybrid architecture for remote laboratories
AU - Murray, Steve
AU - Lowe, David
AU - Lindsay, Euan
AU - Lasky, Vladimir
AU - Liu, Dikai
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - There is growing interest in the use of remote laboratories to access physical laboratory infrastructure. These laboratories can support additional practical components in courses, provide improved access at reduced cost, and encourage sharing of expensive resources. Effective design of remote laboratories requires attention to both the pedagogic design and the technical support, as well as how these elements interact. We discuss our experiences with a remote laboratory implementation based on a hybrid architecture. This architecture utilises a Web front-end allowing student access to an arbitration system, which permits students to select one of a number of experiments, before being allocated to a particular experimental station. The interaction with the equipment then occurs through a separate stand-alone application which runs on its own virtualized server which the user accesses via a remote desktop client. This hybrid architecture has many benefits, as well as some limitations. For example, it allows rich control and monitoring interfaces to be developed, but also requires students to understand a slightly more complex process for establishing the control. We discuss the reactions to this architecture by different cohorts of students as well as the extent to which the architecture facilitates evolution and expansion of the laboratories.
AB - There is growing interest in the use of remote laboratories to access physical laboratory infrastructure. These laboratories can support additional practical components in courses, provide improved access at reduced cost, and encourage sharing of expensive resources. Effective design of remote laboratories requires attention to both the pedagogic design and the technical support, as well as how these elements interact. We discuss our experiences with a remote laboratory implementation based on a hybrid architecture. This architecture utilises a Web front-end allowing student access to an arbitration system, which permits students to select one of a number of experiments, before being allocated to a particular experimental station. The interaction with the equipment then occurs through a separate stand-alone application which runs on its own virtualized server which the user accesses via a remote desktop client. This hybrid architecture has many benefits, as well as some limitations. For example, it allows rich control and monitoring interfaces to be developed, but also requires students to understand a slightly more complex process for establishing the control. We discuss the reactions to this architecture by different cohorts of students as well as the extent to which the architecture facilitates evolution and expansion of the laboratories.
KW - Architecture
KW - Hybrid
KW - Laboratory
KW - Remote
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650759824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650759824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/FIE.2008.4720332
DO - 10.1109/FIE.2008.4720332
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:78650759824
JO - Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference
JF - Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference
SN - 0190-5848
M1 - 4720332
ER -