Exploring the Multiple Meanings of Adaptive Management: A Case Study of the Lachlan Catchment in the Murray-Darling Basin

J Schoeman, C Allan, C M Finlayson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Managing rivers and sharing their benefits is largely dependent on stakeholder values and knowledge, expressed through policy, governance and institutions. Adaptive management is essentially a social learning process, which can provide a tool to navigate the 'wickedness' of contemporary social-ecological challenges. This research applied an interpretive, qualitative approach to examine government intentions for adaptive management, as expressed in water policy documents, and practitioner experiences of learning through adaptive management in a case study of water management in the Lachlan catchment, Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Data were created from content analysis of government water policy documents and interviews with key water managing and policy stakeholders. Interview participants attached divergent meanings to the concept of adaptive management. Five different 'styles' of adaptive management were found to coexist in the Lachlan catchment, which were associated with different levels of learning. While some learning was ad hoc, there was also promising evidence of more active adaptive management of environmental flows, which was resulting in higher-level learning. The findings highlight a disconnect between how adaptive management is understood in the academic literature, by practitioners, and how it is portrayed in Australian water policy, which is restricting opportunities for higher-level learning. Transformative learning was found to occur in response to crisis, rather than being linked to an intentional learning process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)470-482
Number of pages13
JournalEnvironmental Management
Volume64
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

adaptive management
Catchments
learning
catchment
basin
Water
stakeholder
Water management
water
Rivers
water management
policy
river

Cite this

@article{eea726028b6f4c78b712b4929c88aa9c,
title = "Exploring the Multiple Meanings of Adaptive Management: A Case Study of the Lachlan Catchment in the Murray-Darling Basin",
abstract = "Managing rivers and sharing their benefits is largely dependent on stakeholder values and knowledge, expressed through policy, governance and institutions. Adaptive management is essentially a social learning process, which can provide a tool to navigate the 'wickedness' of contemporary social-ecological challenges. This research applied an interpretive, qualitative approach to examine government intentions for adaptive management, as expressed in water policy documents, and practitioner experiences of learning through adaptive management in a case study of water management in the Lachlan catchment, Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Data were created from content analysis of government water policy documents and interviews with key water managing and policy stakeholders. Interview participants attached divergent meanings to the concept of adaptive management. Five different 'styles' of adaptive management were found to coexist in the Lachlan catchment, which were associated with different levels of learning. While some learning was ad hoc, there was also promising evidence of more active adaptive management of environmental flows, which was resulting in higher-level learning. The findings highlight a disconnect between how adaptive management is understood in the academic literature, by practitioners, and how it is portrayed in Australian water policy, which is restricting opportunities for higher-level learning. Transformative learning was found to occur in response to crisis, rather than being linked to an intentional learning process.",
author = "J Schoeman and C Allan and Finlayson, {C M}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s00267-019-01203-5",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "470--482",
journal = "Environmental Management (New York): an international journal for decision-makers, scientists and environmental auditors",
issn = "0364-152X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the Multiple Meanings of Adaptive Management

T2 - A Case Study of the Lachlan Catchment in the Murray-Darling Basin

AU - Schoeman, J

AU - Allan, C

AU - Finlayson, C M

PY - 2019/9/11

Y1 - 2019/9/11

N2 - Managing rivers and sharing their benefits is largely dependent on stakeholder values and knowledge, expressed through policy, governance and institutions. Adaptive management is essentially a social learning process, which can provide a tool to navigate the 'wickedness' of contemporary social-ecological challenges. This research applied an interpretive, qualitative approach to examine government intentions for adaptive management, as expressed in water policy documents, and practitioner experiences of learning through adaptive management in a case study of water management in the Lachlan catchment, Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Data were created from content analysis of government water policy documents and interviews with key water managing and policy stakeholders. Interview participants attached divergent meanings to the concept of adaptive management. Five different 'styles' of adaptive management were found to coexist in the Lachlan catchment, which were associated with different levels of learning. While some learning was ad hoc, there was also promising evidence of more active adaptive management of environmental flows, which was resulting in higher-level learning. The findings highlight a disconnect between how adaptive management is understood in the academic literature, by practitioners, and how it is portrayed in Australian water policy, which is restricting opportunities for higher-level learning. Transformative learning was found to occur in response to crisis, rather than being linked to an intentional learning process.

AB - Managing rivers and sharing their benefits is largely dependent on stakeholder values and knowledge, expressed through policy, governance and institutions. Adaptive management is essentially a social learning process, which can provide a tool to navigate the 'wickedness' of contemporary social-ecological challenges. This research applied an interpretive, qualitative approach to examine government intentions for adaptive management, as expressed in water policy documents, and practitioner experiences of learning through adaptive management in a case study of water management in the Lachlan catchment, Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Data were created from content analysis of government water policy documents and interviews with key water managing and policy stakeholders. Interview participants attached divergent meanings to the concept of adaptive management. Five different 'styles' of adaptive management were found to coexist in the Lachlan catchment, which were associated with different levels of learning. While some learning was ad hoc, there was also promising evidence of more active adaptive management of environmental flows, which was resulting in higher-level learning. The findings highlight a disconnect between how adaptive management is understood in the academic literature, by practitioners, and how it is portrayed in Australian water policy, which is restricting opportunities for higher-level learning. Transformative learning was found to occur in response to crisis, rather than being linked to an intentional learning process.

U2 - 10.1007/s00267-019-01203-5

DO - 10.1007/s00267-019-01203-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 31511922

VL - 64

SP - 470

EP - 482

JO - Environmental Management (New York): an international journal for decision-makers, scientists and environmental auditors

JF - Environmental Management (New York): an international journal for decision-makers, scientists and environmental auditors

SN - 0364-152X

IS - 4

ER -