Exploring theoretical engagement in empirical tour guiding research and scholarship 1980–2016: A critical review

Rosemary Black, Betty Weiler, Hanyu Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper critically reviews the theoretical engagement of empirically-based tour guiding literature published in the tourism literature from 1980 to 2016, as a driver for future high-quality, rigorous research. An analysis of 140 empirical studies on tour guides and tour guiding during this period provides a foundation for identifying patterns, trends and gaps in relation to theory engagement. Engagement with theory has increased, particularly since 2010, however the trend is not consistent across variables such as study location and type/genre of tour guiding. The geographical location of tour guiding research is uneven with research predominantly undertaken in Western countries and Asia. A third of all empirically-based tour guiding journal papers were published in four high ranking, high impact tourism journals, and engagement with theory was generally greater for those studies published in high-ranked journals. An important finding is that theory is being used by tour guiding scholars to inform their research, but the testing, refinement and building of new theory is limited. A model depicting five key relationships that have been studied using theory in the tour guiding literature is presented. This model assists in identifying research gaps and opportunities for future research in this field of study.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalScandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 29 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

tourism
ranking
trend
analysis
Asia
Tour guide
Tourism
Ranking
Testing
Empirical study
Research quality
Tourism impacts

Cite this

@article{7d5c209dd62d428ab6f2b3f670a8ca1c,
title = "Exploring theoretical engagement in empirical tour guiding research and scholarship 1980–2016: A critical review",
abstract = "This paper critically reviews the theoretical engagement of empirically-based tour guiding literature published in the tourism literature from 1980 to 2016, as a driver for future high-quality, rigorous research. An analysis of 140 empirical studies on tour guides and tour guiding during this period provides a foundation for identifying patterns, trends and gaps in relation to theory engagement. Engagement with theory has increased, particularly since 2010, however the trend is not consistent across variables such as study location and type/genre of tour guiding. The geographical location of tour guiding research is uneven with research predominantly undertaken in Western countries and Asia. A third of all empirically-based tour guiding journal papers were published in four high ranking, high impact tourism journals, and engagement with theory was generally greater for those studies published in high-ranked journals. An important finding is that theory is being used by tour guiding scholars to inform their research, but the testing, refinement and building of new theory is limited. A model depicting five key relationships that have been studied using theory in the tour guiding literature is presented. This model assists in identifying research gaps and opportunities for future research in this field of study.",
keywords = "Critical review, theory engagement, tour guide, tour guiding",
author = "Rosemary Black and Betty Weiler and Hanyu Chen",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1080/15022250.2018.1493396",
language = "English",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism",
issn = "1502-2250",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring theoretical engagement in empirical tour guiding research and scholarship 1980–2016

T2 - A critical review

AU - Black, Rosemary

AU - Weiler, Betty

AU - Chen, Hanyu

PY - 2018/6/29

Y1 - 2018/6/29

N2 - This paper critically reviews the theoretical engagement of empirically-based tour guiding literature published in the tourism literature from 1980 to 2016, as a driver for future high-quality, rigorous research. An analysis of 140 empirical studies on tour guides and tour guiding during this period provides a foundation for identifying patterns, trends and gaps in relation to theory engagement. Engagement with theory has increased, particularly since 2010, however the trend is not consistent across variables such as study location and type/genre of tour guiding. The geographical location of tour guiding research is uneven with research predominantly undertaken in Western countries and Asia. A third of all empirically-based tour guiding journal papers were published in four high ranking, high impact tourism journals, and engagement with theory was generally greater for those studies published in high-ranked journals. An important finding is that theory is being used by tour guiding scholars to inform their research, but the testing, refinement and building of new theory is limited. A model depicting five key relationships that have been studied using theory in the tour guiding literature is presented. This model assists in identifying research gaps and opportunities for future research in this field of study.

AB - This paper critically reviews the theoretical engagement of empirically-based tour guiding literature published in the tourism literature from 1980 to 2016, as a driver for future high-quality, rigorous research. An analysis of 140 empirical studies on tour guides and tour guiding during this period provides a foundation for identifying patterns, trends and gaps in relation to theory engagement. Engagement with theory has increased, particularly since 2010, however the trend is not consistent across variables such as study location and type/genre of tour guiding. The geographical location of tour guiding research is uneven with research predominantly undertaken in Western countries and Asia. A third of all empirically-based tour guiding journal papers were published in four high ranking, high impact tourism journals, and engagement with theory was generally greater for those studies published in high-ranked journals. An important finding is that theory is being used by tour guiding scholars to inform their research, but the testing, refinement and building of new theory is limited. A model depicting five key relationships that have been studied using theory in the tour guiding literature is presented. This model assists in identifying research gaps and opportunities for future research in this field of study.

KW - Critical review

KW - theory engagement

KW - tour guide

KW - tour guiding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049129275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049129275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15022250.2018.1493396

DO - 10.1080/15022250.2018.1493396

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85049129275

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism

SN - 1502-2250

ER -