Extremes in justice

how arguments are framed by conservation and farmer groups when attempting to influence water policy

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperConference paper

14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A great deal has been written about the role of stakeholder groups in influencing policy. Here, I focus on two related theoretical concepts in the policy literature: 'frame' construction and agenda setting. I use a case study of NSW to show how competing stakeholder groups (Peak Farmer Groups and Peak Conservation Groups) attempt to garner support from the wider community about water policy. They use a number of frames based around justice and security to connect with the wider community. These frames not only simplify a complex debate, but also enable a stakeholder group have a message that resonates within the wider community. Associated with this messaging, are attempts by the stakeholder groups to form diverse coalitions. These coalitions help disseminate the message and give the substantive issues within each frame perceived legitimacy. These tactics seem to be used because the support of a more powerful urban community and media are critical in winning battles over water policy. However this approach comes at a cost. By simplifying a message and creating coalitions, complex and uncertain water problems cannot be adequately communicated and this, in turn, may in turn end up throttling policy innovation.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication6th Australian Stream Management Conference
Subtitle of host publicationManaging for extremes
EditorsIan Rutherfurd
Place of PublicationAustralia
PublisherRiver Basin Management Society
Pages143-150
Number of pages8
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Event6th Australian Stream Management Conference - National Convention Centre, Canberra, Australia
Duration: 06 Feb 201208 Feb 2012
https://rbms.com.au/event/asm/6asm/ (Conference proceedings)

Conference

Conference6th Australian Stream Management Conference
Abbreviated titleManaging for extremes
CountryAustralia
CityCanberra
Period06/02/1208/02/12
Internet address

Fingerprint

farmer
conservation
justice
water
stakeholder
coalition
Group
community
innovation policy
tactics
legitimacy
costs

Cite this

Howard, J. (2012). Extremes in justice: how arguments are framed by conservation and farmer groups when attempting to influence water policy. In I. Rutherfurd (Ed.), 6th Australian Stream Management Conference: Managing for extremes (pp. 143-150). Australia: River Basin Management Society.
Howard, Jonathon. / Extremes in justice : how arguments are framed by conservation and farmer groups when attempting to influence water policy. 6th Australian Stream Management Conference: Managing for extremes. editor / Ian Rutherfurd. Australia : River Basin Management Society, 2012. pp. 143-150
@inproceedings{dbf059aa59974205a8b0ffb5fa2c6168,
title = "Extremes in justice: how arguments are framed by conservation and farmer groups when attempting to influence water policy",
abstract = "A great deal has been written about the role of stakeholder groups in influencing policy. Here, I focus on two related theoretical concepts in the policy literature: 'frame' construction and agenda setting. I use a case study of NSW to show how competing stakeholder groups (Peak Farmer Groups and Peak Conservation Groups) attempt to garner support from the wider community about water policy. They use a number of frames based around justice and security to connect with the wider community. These frames not only simplify a complex debate, but also enable a stakeholder group have a message that resonates within the wider community. Associated with this messaging, are attempts by the stakeholder groups to form diverse coalitions. These coalitions help disseminate the message and give the substantive issues within each frame perceived legitimacy. These tactics seem to be used because the support of a more powerful urban community and media are critical in winning battles over water policy. However this approach comes at a cost. By simplifying a message and creating coalitions, complex and uncertain water problems cannot be adequately communicated and this, in turn, may in turn end up throttling policy innovation.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Agenda setting, Frames, Justice, Lobby groups, Policy, Stakeholders, Water",
author = "Jonathon Howard",
note = "Imported on 03 May 2017 - DigiTool details were: publisher = Australia: River Basin Management Society, 2012. editor/s (773b) = Ian Rutherfurd; Event dates (773o) = 6-8 February 2012; Parent title (773t) = Australian Stream Management Conference.",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
pages = "143--150",
editor = "Ian Rutherfurd",
booktitle = "6th Australian Stream Management Conference",
publisher = "River Basin Management Society",

}

Howard, J 2012, Extremes in justice: how arguments are framed by conservation and farmer groups when attempting to influence water policy. in I Rutherfurd (ed.), 6th Australian Stream Management Conference: Managing for extremes. River Basin Management Society, Australia, pp. 143-150, 6th Australian Stream Management Conference, Canberra, Australia, 06/02/12.

Extremes in justice : how arguments are framed by conservation and farmer groups when attempting to influence water policy. / Howard, Jonathon.

6th Australian Stream Management Conference: Managing for extremes. ed. / Ian Rutherfurd. Australia : River Basin Management Society, 2012. p. 143-150.

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperConference paper

TY - GEN

T1 - Extremes in justice

T2 - how arguments are framed by conservation and farmer groups when attempting to influence water policy

AU - Howard, Jonathon

N1 - Imported on 03 May 2017 - DigiTool details were: publisher = Australia: River Basin Management Society, 2012. editor/s (773b) = Ian Rutherfurd; Event dates (773o) = 6-8 February 2012; Parent title (773t) = Australian Stream Management Conference.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - A great deal has been written about the role of stakeholder groups in influencing policy. Here, I focus on two related theoretical concepts in the policy literature: 'frame' construction and agenda setting. I use a case study of NSW to show how competing stakeholder groups (Peak Farmer Groups and Peak Conservation Groups) attempt to garner support from the wider community about water policy. They use a number of frames based around justice and security to connect with the wider community. These frames not only simplify a complex debate, but also enable a stakeholder group have a message that resonates within the wider community. Associated with this messaging, are attempts by the stakeholder groups to form diverse coalitions. These coalitions help disseminate the message and give the substantive issues within each frame perceived legitimacy. These tactics seem to be used because the support of a more powerful urban community and media are critical in winning battles over water policy. However this approach comes at a cost. By simplifying a message and creating coalitions, complex and uncertain water problems cannot be adequately communicated and this, in turn, may in turn end up throttling policy innovation.

AB - A great deal has been written about the role of stakeholder groups in influencing policy. Here, I focus on two related theoretical concepts in the policy literature: 'frame' construction and agenda setting. I use a case study of NSW to show how competing stakeholder groups (Peak Farmer Groups and Peak Conservation Groups) attempt to garner support from the wider community about water policy. They use a number of frames based around justice and security to connect with the wider community. These frames not only simplify a complex debate, but also enable a stakeholder group have a message that resonates within the wider community. Associated with this messaging, are attempts by the stakeholder groups to form diverse coalitions. These coalitions help disseminate the message and give the substantive issues within each frame perceived legitimacy. These tactics seem to be used because the support of a more powerful urban community and media are critical in winning battles over water policy. However this approach comes at a cost. By simplifying a message and creating coalitions, complex and uncertain water problems cannot be adequately communicated and this, in turn, may in turn end up throttling policy innovation.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Agenda setting

KW - Frames

KW - Justice

KW - Lobby groups

KW - Policy

KW - Stakeholders

KW - Water

M3 - Conference paper

SP - 143

EP - 150

BT - 6th Australian Stream Management Conference

A2 - Rutherfurd, Ian

PB - River Basin Management Society

CY - Australia

ER -

Howard J. Extremes in justice: how arguments are framed by conservation and farmer groups when attempting to influence water policy. In Rutherfurd I, editor, 6th Australian Stream Management Conference: Managing for extremes. Australia: River Basin Management Society. 2012. p. 143-150