Factors affecting beef cattle producer perspectives on feed efficiency

J. D. Wulfhorst, J. K. Ahola, S. L. Kane, L. D. Keenan, R. A. Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To establish the basis for implementation of a producer education program, a social assessment of the willingness and barriers to adoption of a measure of feed efficiency in beef cattle [residual feed intake (RFI)] was conducted. A 35-question mailed survey was sent to 1,888 producers acquired from the stratified random sample of the Idaho Cattle Association member list (n = 488), Red Angus Association of America member list (n = 2,208), and Red Angus Association of America bull buyer list (n = 5,325). The adjusted response rate for the survey was 49.9%. Of the survey respondents, 58.7% were commercial cow/ calf producers and 41.3% were seedstock producers or operated a combination seedstock/commercial operation. Commercial operations had an average of 223 ± 17 cows and 13 ± 3 bulls, whereas seedstock herds (including combination herds) had slightly fewer cows (206 ± 24) and more bulls (23 ± 6). Both commercial and seedstock operators indicated that calving ease/ birth weight was the most important trait used to evaluate genetic merit of breeding bulls. Only 3.8 and 4.8% of commercial and seedstock producers indicated that feed efficiency was the most important characteristic used for bull selection. Binary logistic regression models were used to predict willingness of seedstock producers to begin collecting data for the calculation of RFI on their bulls, or to predict willingness of commercial producers to begin selecting bulls based on RFI data. In response, 49.1% of commercial producers and 43.6% of seedstock producers indicated they were willing to adopt RFI as a measure of feed efficiency. These data indicate that feed efficiency was one of the traits that producers consider important; those who perceive feed efficiency as important tended to be actively involved in data collection on their herds, underpinning the notion that objective assessment was valued and used by some. Additional data collection in a future social assessment will continue to elaborate the proportion of producers who perceive feed efficiency as an increasingly important decision and management tool for beef production.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3749-3758
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Animal Science
Volume88
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Nov 2010

Fingerprint

beef cattle
bulls
feed conversion
feed intake
Red Angus
Logistic Models
herds
ease of birth
Birth Weight
Breeding
cow-calf operations
cows
genetic merit
operator regions
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires
education programs
birth weight
calving
beef

Cite this

Wulfhorst, J. D. ; Ahola, J. K. ; Kane, S. L. ; Keenan, L. D. ; Hill, R. A. / Factors affecting beef cattle producer perspectives on feed efficiency. In: Journal of Animal Science. 2010 ; Vol. 88, No. 11. pp. 3749-3758.
@article{edc23e25a6844fc1949b8bf45ac943b7,
title = "Factors affecting beef cattle producer perspectives on feed efficiency",
abstract = "To establish the basis for implementation of a producer education program, a social assessment of the willingness and barriers to adoption of a measure of feed efficiency in beef cattle [residual feed intake (RFI)] was conducted. A 35-question mailed survey was sent to 1,888 producers acquired from the stratified random sample of the Idaho Cattle Association member list (n = 488), Red Angus Association of America member list (n = 2,208), and Red Angus Association of America bull buyer list (n = 5,325). The adjusted response rate for the survey was 49.9{\%}. Of the survey respondents, 58.7{\%} were commercial cow/ calf producers and 41.3{\%} were seedstock producers or operated a combination seedstock/commercial operation. Commercial operations had an average of 223 ± 17 cows and 13 ± 3 bulls, whereas seedstock herds (including combination herds) had slightly fewer cows (206 ± 24) and more bulls (23 ± 6). Both commercial and seedstock operators indicated that calving ease/ birth weight was the most important trait used to evaluate genetic merit of breeding bulls. Only 3.8 and 4.8{\%} of commercial and seedstock producers indicated that feed efficiency was the most important characteristic used for bull selection. Binary logistic regression models were used to predict willingness of seedstock producers to begin collecting data for the calculation of RFI on their bulls, or to predict willingness of commercial producers to begin selecting bulls based on RFI data. In response, 49.1{\%} of commercial producers and 43.6{\%} of seedstock producers indicated they were willing to adopt RFI as a measure of feed efficiency. These data indicate that feed efficiency was one of the traits that producers consider important; those who perceive feed efficiency as important tended to be actively involved in data collection on their herds, underpinning the notion that objective assessment was valued and used by some. Additional data collection in a future social assessment will continue to elaborate the proportion of producers who perceive feed efficiency as an increasingly important decision and management tool for beef production.",
keywords = "Beef cattle producer, Feed efficiency, Residual feed intake, Social survey",
author = "Wulfhorst, {J. D.} and Ahola, {J. K.} and Kane, {S. L.} and Keenan, {L. D.} and Hill, {R. A.}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2527/jas.2010-2907",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "3749--3758",
journal = "J Anim Sci",
issn = "0021-8812",
publisher = "American Society of Animal Science",
number = "11",

}

Factors affecting beef cattle producer perspectives on feed efficiency. / Wulfhorst, J. D.; Ahola, J. K.; Kane, S. L.; Keenan, L. D.; Hill, R. A.

In: Journal of Animal Science, Vol. 88, No. 11, 01.11.2010, p. 3749-3758.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors affecting beef cattle producer perspectives on feed efficiency

AU - Wulfhorst, J. D.

AU - Ahola, J. K.

AU - Kane, S. L.

AU - Keenan, L. D.

AU - Hill, R. A.

PY - 2010/11/1

Y1 - 2010/11/1

N2 - To establish the basis for implementation of a producer education program, a social assessment of the willingness and barriers to adoption of a measure of feed efficiency in beef cattle [residual feed intake (RFI)] was conducted. A 35-question mailed survey was sent to 1,888 producers acquired from the stratified random sample of the Idaho Cattle Association member list (n = 488), Red Angus Association of America member list (n = 2,208), and Red Angus Association of America bull buyer list (n = 5,325). The adjusted response rate for the survey was 49.9%. Of the survey respondents, 58.7% were commercial cow/ calf producers and 41.3% were seedstock producers or operated a combination seedstock/commercial operation. Commercial operations had an average of 223 ± 17 cows and 13 ± 3 bulls, whereas seedstock herds (including combination herds) had slightly fewer cows (206 ± 24) and more bulls (23 ± 6). Both commercial and seedstock operators indicated that calving ease/ birth weight was the most important trait used to evaluate genetic merit of breeding bulls. Only 3.8 and 4.8% of commercial and seedstock producers indicated that feed efficiency was the most important characteristic used for bull selection. Binary logistic regression models were used to predict willingness of seedstock producers to begin collecting data for the calculation of RFI on their bulls, or to predict willingness of commercial producers to begin selecting bulls based on RFI data. In response, 49.1% of commercial producers and 43.6% of seedstock producers indicated they were willing to adopt RFI as a measure of feed efficiency. These data indicate that feed efficiency was one of the traits that producers consider important; those who perceive feed efficiency as important tended to be actively involved in data collection on their herds, underpinning the notion that objective assessment was valued and used by some. Additional data collection in a future social assessment will continue to elaborate the proportion of producers who perceive feed efficiency as an increasingly important decision and management tool for beef production.

AB - To establish the basis for implementation of a producer education program, a social assessment of the willingness and barriers to adoption of a measure of feed efficiency in beef cattle [residual feed intake (RFI)] was conducted. A 35-question mailed survey was sent to 1,888 producers acquired from the stratified random sample of the Idaho Cattle Association member list (n = 488), Red Angus Association of America member list (n = 2,208), and Red Angus Association of America bull buyer list (n = 5,325). The adjusted response rate for the survey was 49.9%. Of the survey respondents, 58.7% were commercial cow/ calf producers and 41.3% were seedstock producers or operated a combination seedstock/commercial operation. Commercial operations had an average of 223 ± 17 cows and 13 ± 3 bulls, whereas seedstock herds (including combination herds) had slightly fewer cows (206 ± 24) and more bulls (23 ± 6). Both commercial and seedstock operators indicated that calving ease/ birth weight was the most important trait used to evaluate genetic merit of breeding bulls. Only 3.8 and 4.8% of commercial and seedstock producers indicated that feed efficiency was the most important characteristic used for bull selection. Binary logistic regression models were used to predict willingness of seedstock producers to begin collecting data for the calculation of RFI on their bulls, or to predict willingness of commercial producers to begin selecting bulls based on RFI data. In response, 49.1% of commercial producers and 43.6% of seedstock producers indicated they were willing to adopt RFI as a measure of feed efficiency. These data indicate that feed efficiency was one of the traits that producers consider important; those who perceive feed efficiency as important tended to be actively involved in data collection on their herds, underpinning the notion that objective assessment was valued and used by some. Additional data collection in a future social assessment will continue to elaborate the proportion of producers who perceive feed efficiency as an increasingly important decision and management tool for beef production.

KW - Beef cattle producer

KW - Feed efficiency

KW - Residual feed intake

KW - Social survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049318584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78049318584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2527/jas.2010-2907

DO - 10.2527/jas.2010-2907

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 3749

EP - 3758

JO - J Anim Sci

JF - J Anim Sci

SN - 0021-8812

IS - 11

ER -