@article{fcd7b67f0b1040929d53270e30da8713,
title = "Factors driving long term declines in inland fishery yields in the Mekong Delta",
abstract = "The Mekong basin{\textquoteright}s fisheries are important sources of food, income, and livelihoods for millions of people in six countries. However, fish yields appear to have declined in recent years according to reports from local fishers throughout the basin. It is important to understand the factors driving the decline in fisheries so that they can be adequately managed. We analysed interview data from 1020 fishers in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam in 2014 to identify trends in catch rates and the possible factors driving the trends. Most of the fishers (68–90%) reported that their catch rates had declined over the previous five years, although some fishers stated that their fish catches had remained stable or even increased. They identified eleven factors that they believed contribute to declines in fish catches, among which the use of illegal gears and overfishing were considered most important, with other factors relatively unimportant. Separately, long-term datasets (1995–2016) showed a general decline in commercial fish catches, which was positively correlated with peak water levels (which indicate flood levels), and negatively correlated with the intensification of rice farming, especially where flooding has been prevented to allow a third annual rice crop. Some data suggests that fishing effort has declined significantly in recent years, so an apparent downward trend in catches is not likely to be a result of overfishing as believed by fishers, which suggests that fishers are not aware of or under-rate the significance of hydrological and land-use/landscape changes. Due to the exceptional importance of the Mekong fishery and the interactions with other more dominant sectors, improved data collection is required to quantify changes in fisheries that result from land use and hydrological changes, and to guide planning which would better resolve competing demands for water and land use.",
keywords = "Capture fisheries, Fish migration, Flooding, Habitat fragmentation, Land use, Lower Mekong Basin, Overfishing",
author = "Vu, {An V.} and Hortle, {Kent G.} and Nguyen, {Du N.}",
note = "Funding Information: In this study, 34 sites in different habitats representative of the main stem, “tributary”, and coastal areas in the MDV were chosen in which to select fishers for interviewing (Figure 2). Most of the interview sites (24 sites) were located along “tributaries”, which in this context describes the canalised environment between the main river channels, where large primary canals connect the main river channels laterally to balance flows, and secondary and tertiary canals distribute irrigation water and provide drainage. Water flows in both directions in these highly engineered canal systems, where much of the original landscape was swamplands. A further seven sites were selected along the main channels and three sites were selected near the coast. A total of 1020 fishers (30 fishers per site) were interviewed in 2014, using structured questionnaires to obtain information on: (1) their recall of trends in their fish catches in the previous five years (increase, decrease, stable, or do not know); (2) their opinions of the factors driving trends in their fish catches; (3) their fishing gears and methods used; (4) the occupations of fishers aside from or as well as fishing; and (5) their fishing experience. Fishers with relatively long-term fishing experience were selected for interviews because we aimed to investigate long-term changes. The selection of fishers followed consultation with local authorities who knew the fishing households, after which fishers were interviewed by project staff and local officers. Participating in an interview was based on the willingness of fishers. To avoid bias we did not provide any gifts or financial support. To ensure consistency, each interviewer was trained and provided with guidelines that explained the interviewing procedure and each question{\textquoteright}s purpose. Among 1020 fishers selected for interviewing, there were coincidentally eight fishers who had recorded their catches and effort each day under a separate program by the Research Institute for Aquaculture No.2 (RIA2) which was funded by the Mekong River Commission (MRC; Figure 2). Daily catches of these eight fishers from 2009 to 2014 were examined to determine if any trends were evident and for comparison with our interview data, which was based on recall. Funding Information: in both directions in these highly engineered canal systems, where much of the original landscape was swamplands. A further seven sites were selected along the main channels and three sites were selected near the coast. A total of 1020 fishers (30 fishers per site) were interviewed in 2014, using structured questionnaires to obtain information on: (1) their recall of trends in their fish catches in the previous five years (increase, decrease, stable, or do not know); (2) their opinions of the factors driving trends in their fish catches; (3) their fishing gears and methods used; (4) the occupations of fishers aside from or as well as fishing; and (5) their fishing experience. Fishers with relatively long-term fishing experience were selected for interviews because we aimed to investigate long-term changes. The selection of fishers followed consultation with local authorities who knew the fishing households, after which fishers were interviewed by project staff and local officers. Participating in an interview was based on the willingness of fishers. To avoid bias we did not provide any gifts or financial support. To ensure consistency, each interviewer was trained and provided with guidelines that explained the interviewing procedure and each question{\textquoteright}s purpose. Among 1020 fishers selected for interviewing, there were coincidentally eight fishers who had recorded their catches and effort each day under a separate program by the Research Institute for Aquaculture No.2 (RIA2) which was funded by the Mekong River Commission (MRC; Figure 2). Daily catches of these eight fishers from5 2o0f0194 to 2014 were examined to determine if any trends were evident and for comparison with our interview data, which was based on recall. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.",
year = "2021",
month = apr,
day = "7",
doi = "10.3390/w13081005",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Water (Switzerland)",
issn = "2073-4441",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "8",
}