Faith, justice and Catholic public memory: The politics of reconciliation in Australia and New Zealand

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperChapter (peer-reviewed)

Abstract

Since the early 1990s, reconciliation has influenced Australian political discourse to reflect a unique political/theological policy nexus in a jurisdiction where prevailing values and practices ordinarily position religious ideals beyond the political system’s overt and immediate concern. In indigenous policy, the Catholic Church’s own public memory has assumed particular influence as the Church responds to its historical acquiescence with public policies of un-Christian intent: the removal of indigenous children from their families and a general failure to confront colonialism’s cultural and economic impact. On a national level, reconciliation is both public memory and practical politics. It requires acknowledgement of wrong-doing, sorrow and substantive resolve to settle conflict through the development of ‘socially just’ relationships. Reconciliation is a particular way of ‘calling up’ the past through acts of public memory which illuminate, in a liberal democracy, questions of relational justice. This chapter draws on New Zealand examples to contextualize its assessment of reconciliation as public memory in Australian policy discourse. The Treaty of Waitangi has provided the rationale and framework for successive New Zealand governments to say sorry for acts of aggression against Maori tribes. In New Zealand, sorrow is expressed through Acts of Parliament that serve not only as instruments of restitution but as symbols of public memory. Through the treaty, reconciliation is entrenched into New Zealand law and politics and, in contrast with Australia (which lacks a treaty with its indigenous peoples), certainty surrounds questions of apology, including that of who ought to apologize to whom and for what.
LanguageEnglish
Title of book or conference publicationInjustice, Memory and Faith in Human Rights
EditorsKalliopi Chainoglou, Barry Collins, Michael Phillips, John Strawson
Place of PublicationAbingdon, Oxon
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter11
Pages169-181
Number of pages13
Edition/Issue3rd
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-315-58857-5
ISBN (Print)978-14724-6232-9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

reconciliation
faith
New Zealand
justice
politics
treaty
church
discourse
colonial age
economic impact
political system
parliament
aggression
jurisdiction
symbol
ethnic group
public policy
act
democracy
Law

Cite this

O'Sullivan, D. (2018). Faith, justice and Catholic public memory: The politics of reconciliation in Australia and New Zealand. In K. Chainoglou, B. Collins, M. Phillips, & J. Strawson (Eds.), Injustice, Memory and Faith in Human Rights (3rd ed., pp. 169-181). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315588575
O'Sullivan, Dominic. / Faith, justice and Catholic public memory : The politics of reconciliation in Australia and New Zealand. Injustice, Memory and Faith in Human Rights. editor / Kalliopi Chainoglou ; Barry Collins ; Michael Phillips ; John Strawson. 3rd. ed. Abingdon, Oxon : Routledge, 2018. pp. 169-181
@inbook{0479ce75d2fd4c1e803c970fcd032f67,
title = "Faith, justice and Catholic public memory: The politics of reconciliation in Australia and New Zealand",
abstract = "Since the early 1990s, reconciliation has influenced Australian political discourse to reflect a unique political/theological policy nexus in a jurisdiction where prevailing values and practices ordinarily position religious ideals beyond the political system’s overt and immediate concern. In indigenous policy, the Catholic Church’s own public memory has assumed particular influence as the Church responds to its historical acquiescence with public policies of un-Christian intent: the removal of indigenous children from their families and a general failure to confront colonialism’s cultural and economic impact. On a national level, reconciliation is both public memory and practical politics. It requires acknowledgement of wrong-doing, sorrow and substantive resolve to settle conflict through the development of ‘socially just’ relationships. Reconciliation is a particular way of ‘calling up’ the past through acts of public memory which illuminate, in a liberal democracy, questions of relational justice. This chapter draws on New Zealand examples to contextualize its assessment of reconciliation as public memory in Australian policy discourse. The Treaty of Waitangi has provided the rationale and framework for successive New Zealand governments to say sorry for acts of aggression against Maori tribes. In New Zealand, sorrow is expressed through Acts of Parliament that serve not only as instruments of restitution but as symbols of public memory. Through the treaty, reconciliation is entrenched into New Zealand law and politics and, in contrast with Australia (which lacks a treaty with its indigenous peoples), certainty surrounds questions of apology, including that of who ought to apologize to whom and for what.",
author = "Dominic O'Sullivan",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.4324/9781315588575",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-14724-6232-9",
pages = "169--181",
editor = "Kalliopi Chainoglou and Barry Collins and Michael Phillips and John Strawson",
booktitle = "Injustice, Memory and Faith in Human Rights",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom",
edition = "3rd",

}

O'Sullivan, D 2018, Faith, justice and Catholic public memory: The politics of reconciliation in Australia and New Zealand. in K Chainoglou, B Collins, M Phillips & J Strawson (eds), Injustice, Memory and Faith in Human Rights. 3rd edn, Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon, pp. 169-181. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315588575

Faith, justice and Catholic public memory : The politics of reconciliation in Australia and New Zealand. / O'Sullivan, Dominic.

Injustice, Memory and Faith in Human Rights. ed. / Kalliopi Chainoglou; Barry Collins; Michael Phillips; John Strawson. 3rd. ed. Abingdon, Oxon : Routledge, 2018. p. 169-181.

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - Faith, justice and Catholic public memory

T2 - The politics of reconciliation in Australia and New Zealand

AU - O'Sullivan, Dominic

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Since the early 1990s, reconciliation has influenced Australian political discourse to reflect a unique political/theological policy nexus in a jurisdiction where prevailing values and practices ordinarily position religious ideals beyond the political system’s overt and immediate concern. In indigenous policy, the Catholic Church’s own public memory has assumed particular influence as the Church responds to its historical acquiescence with public policies of un-Christian intent: the removal of indigenous children from their families and a general failure to confront colonialism’s cultural and economic impact. On a national level, reconciliation is both public memory and practical politics. It requires acknowledgement of wrong-doing, sorrow and substantive resolve to settle conflict through the development of ‘socially just’ relationships. Reconciliation is a particular way of ‘calling up’ the past through acts of public memory which illuminate, in a liberal democracy, questions of relational justice. This chapter draws on New Zealand examples to contextualize its assessment of reconciliation as public memory in Australian policy discourse. The Treaty of Waitangi has provided the rationale and framework for successive New Zealand governments to say sorry for acts of aggression against Maori tribes. In New Zealand, sorrow is expressed through Acts of Parliament that serve not only as instruments of restitution but as symbols of public memory. Through the treaty, reconciliation is entrenched into New Zealand law and politics and, in contrast with Australia (which lacks a treaty with its indigenous peoples), certainty surrounds questions of apology, including that of who ought to apologize to whom and for what.

AB - Since the early 1990s, reconciliation has influenced Australian political discourse to reflect a unique political/theological policy nexus in a jurisdiction where prevailing values and practices ordinarily position religious ideals beyond the political system’s overt and immediate concern. In indigenous policy, the Catholic Church’s own public memory has assumed particular influence as the Church responds to its historical acquiescence with public policies of un-Christian intent: the removal of indigenous children from their families and a general failure to confront colonialism’s cultural and economic impact. On a national level, reconciliation is both public memory and practical politics. It requires acknowledgement of wrong-doing, sorrow and substantive resolve to settle conflict through the development of ‘socially just’ relationships. Reconciliation is a particular way of ‘calling up’ the past through acts of public memory which illuminate, in a liberal democracy, questions of relational justice. This chapter draws on New Zealand examples to contextualize its assessment of reconciliation as public memory in Australian policy discourse. The Treaty of Waitangi has provided the rationale and framework for successive New Zealand governments to say sorry for acts of aggression against Maori tribes. In New Zealand, sorrow is expressed through Acts of Parliament that serve not only as instruments of restitution but as symbols of public memory. Through the treaty, reconciliation is entrenched into New Zealand law and politics and, in contrast with Australia (which lacks a treaty with its indigenous peoples), certainty surrounds questions of apology, including that of who ought to apologize to whom and for what.

U2 - 10.4324/9781315588575

DO - 10.4324/9781315588575

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 978-14724-6232-9

SP - 169

EP - 181

BT - Injustice, Memory and Faith in Human Rights

A2 - Chainoglou, Kalliopi

A2 - Collins, Barry

A2 - Phillips, Michael

A2 - Strawson, John

PB - Routledge

CY - Abingdon, Oxon

ER -

O'Sullivan D. Faith, justice and Catholic public memory: The politics of reconciliation in Australia and New Zealand. In Chainoglou K, Collins B, Phillips M, Strawson J, editors, Injustice, Memory and Faith in Human Rights. 3rd ed. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. 2018. p. 169-181 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315588575