Familiar Nightmares: The Harrowing World of The Handmaid's Tale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The 2017 television adaptation of Margaret Atwood’s dystopian 1985 novel The Handmaid’s Tale has been widely acknowledged as a success. The first ever program produced by a streaming service to win an Emmy Award for Outstanding Drama Series,i it features high-quality production values and an impressive ensemble of actors. The viewer’s experience of The Handmaid’s Tale is largely channelled through likeable chief protagonist Offred, played by Elisabeth Moss, whose fragmented thoughts and memories gradually unveil a nightmare world where the United States’ once-liberal democracy has been overthrown by a punitive theocratic regime. Through Offred’s perspective, we access a deeply regimented sphere in which puritanical religious beliefs are enforceable through armed guards and a secret police force called the Eyes.

As The Handmaid’s Tale unravels over ten episodes, viewers are increasingly confronted with the many injustices perpetrated by the new Republic of Gilead, including women’s biological slavery. The function of the ‘Handmaid’ is to reproduce children for the regime, thus guaranteeing its future. She is a childbearing vessel valued only for her uterus. To describe this new world order as sexist would be an understatement, but it would nevertheless be simplistic to assume that it is simply a tale of men oppressing women. Here, to an extent, women participate in their own subjugation. This is highlighted in scenes in which older women identified as ‘Aunts’ aggressively indoctrinate young fertile women. We also come to learn that the highest-ranking ‘Wife’ in the republic, Serena Joy (Yvonne Strahovski), was instrumental in the development of Gilead’s constitution.

While the exploitation of women by both men and women in the series is utterly devastating, it nonetheless delivers riveting drama. Yet, beyond such drama, The Handmaid’s Tale provides a timely cautionary message concerning the dangers of pernicious real-world regimes rising from the ashes of failed democracies. It also encourages one to reflect upon advancements made in the area of human rights, and upon how easy it would be for a puritanical theocracy to repeal our many freedoms, especially women’s bodily autonomy.
Original languageEnglish
Article number89
Pages (from-to)36
Number of pages43
JournalScreen Education
Issue number89
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018

Fingerprint

drama
regime
republic
theocracy
democracy
world order
slavery
exploitation
ranking
wife
television
constitution
police
human rights
autonomy
Values
experience

Cite this

@article{874a439501a3441d849cf960dc429a1e,
title = "Familiar Nightmares: The Harrowing World of The Handmaid's Tale",
abstract = "The 2017 television adaptation of Margaret Atwood’s dystopian 1985 novel The Handmaid’s Tale has been widely acknowledged as a success. The first ever program produced by a streaming service to win an Emmy Award for Outstanding Drama Series,i it features high-quality production values and an impressive ensemble of actors. The viewer’s experience of The Handmaid’s Tale is largely channelled through likeable chief protagonist Offred, played by Elisabeth Moss, whose fragmented thoughts and memories gradually unveil a nightmare world where the United States’ once-liberal democracy has been overthrown by a punitive theocratic regime. Through Offred’s perspective, we access a deeply regimented sphere in which puritanical religious beliefs are enforceable through armed guards and a secret police force called the Eyes. As The Handmaid’s Tale unravels over ten episodes, viewers are increasingly confronted with the many injustices perpetrated by the new Republic of Gilead, including women’s biological slavery. The function of the ‘Handmaid’ is to reproduce children for the regime, thus guaranteeing its future. She is a childbearing vessel valued only for her uterus. To describe this new world order as sexist would be an understatement, but it would nevertheless be simplistic to assume that it is simply a tale of men oppressing women. Here, to an extent, women participate in their own subjugation. This is highlighted in scenes in which older women identified as ‘Aunts’ aggressively indoctrinate young fertile women. We also come to learn that the highest-ranking ‘Wife’ in the republic, Serena Joy (Yvonne Strahovski), was instrumental in the development of Gilead’s constitution. While the exploitation of women by both men and women in the series is utterly devastating, it nonetheless delivers riveting drama. Yet, beyond such drama, The Handmaid’s Tale provides a timely cautionary message concerning the dangers of pernicious real-world regimes rising from the ashes of failed democracies. It also encourages one to reflect upon advancements made in the area of human rights, and upon how easy it would be for a puritanical theocracy to repeal our many freedoms, especially women’s bodily autonomy.",
keywords = "Power, Patriarchy, The Handmaid's Tale, Political Extremism, Systematic Dehumanisation, Fertility as a Resource, Paralleling Real-World Injustices",
author = "Suzanne Gibson",
note = "Dr Suzie Gibson is a senior lecturer at Charles Sturt University. She has published widely in distinguished national and international journals, covering the fields of literature, film and television. Her research is informed by her knowledge of nineteenth-century literature, feminism and philosophy.",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
language = "English",
pages = "36",
journal = "Screen Education",
issn = "1323-3386",
number = "89",

}

Familiar Nightmares: The Harrowing World of The Handmaid's Tale. / Gibson, Suzanne.

In: Screen Education, No. 89, 89, 03.2018, p. 36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Familiar Nightmares: The Harrowing World of The Handmaid's Tale

AU - Gibson, Suzanne

N1 - Dr Suzie Gibson is a senior lecturer at Charles Sturt University. She has published widely in distinguished national and international journals, covering the fields of literature, film and television. Her research is informed by her knowledge of nineteenth-century literature, feminism and philosophy.

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - The 2017 television adaptation of Margaret Atwood’s dystopian 1985 novel The Handmaid’s Tale has been widely acknowledged as a success. The first ever program produced by a streaming service to win an Emmy Award for Outstanding Drama Series,i it features high-quality production values and an impressive ensemble of actors. The viewer’s experience of The Handmaid’s Tale is largely channelled through likeable chief protagonist Offred, played by Elisabeth Moss, whose fragmented thoughts and memories gradually unveil a nightmare world where the United States’ once-liberal democracy has been overthrown by a punitive theocratic regime. Through Offred’s perspective, we access a deeply regimented sphere in which puritanical religious beliefs are enforceable through armed guards and a secret police force called the Eyes. As The Handmaid’s Tale unravels over ten episodes, viewers are increasingly confronted with the many injustices perpetrated by the new Republic of Gilead, including women’s biological slavery. The function of the ‘Handmaid’ is to reproduce children for the regime, thus guaranteeing its future. She is a childbearing vessel valued only for her uterus. To describe this new world order as sexist would be an understatement, but it would nevertheless be simplistic to assume that it is simply a tale of men oppressing women. Here, to an extent, women participate in their own subjugation. This is highlighted in scenes in which older women identified as ‘Aunts’ aggressively indoctrinate young fertile women. We also come to learn that the highest-ranking ‘Wife’ in the republic, Serena Joy (Yvonne Strahovski), was instrumental in the development of Gilead’s constitution. While the exploitation of women by both men and women in the series is utterly devastating, it nonetheless delivers riveting drama. Yet, beyond such drama, The Handmaid’s Tale provides a timely cautionary message concerning the dangers of pernicious real-world regimes rising from the ashes of failed democracies. It also encourages one to reflect upon advancements made in the area of human rights, and upon how easy it would be for a puritanical theocracy to repeal our many freedoms, especially women’s bodily autonomy.

AB - The 2017 television adaptation of Margaret Atwood’s dystopian 1985 novel The Handmaid’s Tale has been widely acknowledged as a success. The first ever program produced by a streaming service to win an Emmy Award for Outstanding Drama Series,i it features high-quality production values and an impressive ensemble of actors. The viewer’s experience of The Handmaid’s Tale is largely channelled through likeable chief protagonist Offred, played by Elisabeth Moss, whose fragmented thoughts and memories gradually unveil a nightmare world where the United States’ once-liberal democracy has been overthrown by a punitive theocratic regime. Through Offred’s perspective, we access a deeply regimented sphere in which puritanical religious beliefs are enforceable through armed guards and a secret police force called the Eyes. As The Handmaid’s Tale unravels over ten episodes, viewers are increasingly confronted with the many injustices perpetrated by the new Republic of Gilead, including women’s biological slavery. The function of the ‘Handmaid’ is to reproduce children for the regime, thus guaranteeing its future. She is a childbearing vessel valued only for her uterus. To describe this new world order as sexist would be an understatement, but it would nevertheless be simplistic to assume that it is simply a tale of men oppressing women. Here, to an extent, women participate in their own subjugation. This is highlighted in scenes in which older women identified as ‘Aunts’ aggressively indoctrinate young fertile women. We also come to learn that the highest-ranking ‘Wife’ in the republic, Serena Joy (Yvonne Strahovski), was instrumental in the development of Gilead’s constitution. While the exploitation of women by both men and women in the series is utterly devastating, it nonetheless delivers riveting drama. Yet, beyond such drama, The Handmaid’s Tale provides a timely cautionary message concerning the dangers of pernicious real-world regimes rising from the ashes of failed democracies. It also encourages one to reflect upon advancements made in the area of human rights, and upon how easy it would be for a puritanical theocracy to repeal our many freedoms, especially women’s bodily autonomy.

KW - Power, Patriarchy, The Handmaid's Tale, Political Extremism, Systematic Dehumanisation, Fertility as a Resource, Paralleling Real-World Injustices

M3 - Article

SP - 36

JO - Screen Education

JF - Screen Education

SN - 1323-3386

IS - 89

M1 - 89

ER -