TY - JOUR
T1 - Forward flow-an alternative interpretation
T2 - Comment on Gray et al. (2019)
AU - Rossiter, John R.
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - Gray et al. (2019) proposed a new construct to predict creativity, which they called forward flow, measured as the originality of chained word associations. Chained word associations, however, do not meet the requirements of a test of originality. The items ask for only 1 response when multiple responses are needed to assess originality, and the sequential responding means that the items are not independent as required for a test. Also, the originality of the associations is questionably calculated from the starting word instead of in relation to the preceding cue word. Probably because of these problems, scores on the new construct measured in this way show only weak correlations with scores on standard measures of creativity.
AB - Gray et al. (2019) proposed a new construct to predict creativity, which they called forward flow, measured as the originality of chained word associations. Chained word associations, however, do not meet the requirements of a test of originality. The items ask for only 1 response when multiple responses are needed to assess originality, and the sequential responding means that the items are not independent as required for a test. Also, the originality of the associations is questionably calculated from the starting word instead of in relation to the preceding cue word. Probably because of these problems, scores on the new construct measured in this way show only weak correlations with scores on standard measures of creativity.
KW - Chained associations
KW - Creativity
KW - Forward flow
KW - Originality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088155927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088155927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 32673016
AN - SCOPUS:85088155927
VL - 75
SP - 725
EP - 726
JO - American Psychologist
JF - American Psychologist
SN - 0003-066X
IS - 5
ER -