TY - JOUR
T1 - Framing the Australian extreme right
T2 - Proposing a threefold typology with consideration of legislation and listing regulations
AU - Campion, Kristy
AU - Nolan, Mark
AU - O'Brien, Nick
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Department of Security Studies and Criminology.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The contemporary extreme right is home to diverse milieus, some of which challenge or confuse stereotypicalunderstandings of the threat. This study seeks to describe and organise the different milieus of the Australian extreme rightinto a typology based on the past decade of observable violent activities. The typology proposes a threefold way to viewthe Australian extreme right: 1. ethnocentric milieus, who asymmetrically evaluate other peoples and cultures, commonlyinformed by abstractions and preconceptions, especially as related to religion or ethnicity; 2. anti-government milieus, whofixate on the government and its policies as the primary source of societal woes; and 3. religious milieus, spanningnumerous religious traditions and faiths, who anchor their worldviews in theological constructions. Having developed thistypology, we revisited counteractions anchored in international practice and domestic legislation. We suggest that theexisting domestic legislative environment is sufficient to manage these threats when informed by international practice.
AB - The contemporary extreme right is home to diverse milieus, some of which challenge or confuse stereotypicalunderstandings of the threat. This study seeks to describe and organise the different milieus of the Australian extreme rightinto a typology based on the past decade of observable violent activities. The typology proposes a threefold way to viewthe Australian extreme right: 1. ethnocentric milieus, who asymmetrically evaluate other peoples and cultures, commonlyinformed by abstractions and preconceptions, especially as related to religion or ethnicity; 2. anti-government milieus, whofixate on the government and its policies as the primary source of societal woes; and 3. religious milieus, spanningnumerous religious traditions and faiths, who anchor their worldviews in theological constructions. Having developed thistypology, we revisited counteractions anchored in international practice and domestic legislation. We suggest that theexisting domestic legislative environment is sufficient to manage these threats when informed by international practice.
KW - Australia
KW - extreme right
KW - typology
KW - listing
KW - counter-terrorism
KW - proscription
KW - anti-government
KW - religious
KW - Terrorism and Political Violence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146775209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146775209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/18335330.2023.2165136
DO - 10.1080/18335330.2023.2165136
M3 - Article
SN - 1833-5330
VL - 18
SP - 282
EP - 306
JO - Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism
JF - Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism
IS - 3
ER -