Abstract
In this paper we scrutinise the claim that interventions arising from positive psychology are always justified in and of themselves (Duckworth, Steen & Seligman, 2005). We claim that it is not morally justifiable for public funding bodies, charged with increasing community wellbeing, to support life enhancement/coaching practises over therapeutic practises. To support this claim we establish intuitive, theoretical, and pragmatic arguments.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 101-110 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Facta Universitatis: Series Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2011 |