Abstract
The neoconservative political landscape is reflected in the workforce in circumstances of psychological injury. The underreporting of workplace psychologicalinjuries (WPI) is widely acknowledged; however, most employees who report aWPI are female. Female workers may be at greater risk of a WPI and may berendered more vulnerable if they formally report, while male employees may perceive reporting as a threat to their identity. This research sought to understandhow employees experience WPI using a qualitative, social constructionist, feministthematic analysis. Fourteen participants who had experienced WPI participated insemi-structured interviews. Participants described gender-stratified and powermediated catalysts to injury and barriers to reporting that impacted their identities.Job crafting was one means of reframing an injury experience to meet neoliberaldemands for “growth”, “productivity” and “self-actualisation”. A diminishedsense of psychological safety in the workplace often underpinned the decision notto report WPI, while neoliberalism informed how a “good” injured worker shouldrespond to WPI. We suggest that power structures within the workforce intersectwith existing systems of oppression such as neoliberalism, compounding andreproducing exclusionary systems that shape experiences of WPI.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Gender, feminist and queer studies |
Subtitle of host publication | Power, privilege and inequality in a time of neoliberal conservatism |
Editors | Donna Bridges, Clifford Lewis, Elizabeth Wulff, Chelsea Litchfield, Larissa Bamberry |
Place of Publication | London |
Publisher | Routledge |
Chapter | 8 |
Pages | 106-119 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Edition | 1st |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781003316954 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781032328294 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |