Gender under fire

Portrayals of military women in the Australian print media

Donna Bridges, Ben Wadham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The news media is historically recognised for producing and reinforcing gendered norms and binaries. Correspondingly militaries are institutions where gender roles and expectations create contention. We conducted a content analysis of two Australian broadsheets; the Australian and the Sydney Morning Herald. We investigated how military women were represented between1997 and 2017, exploring three categories (1). Gendered violence(2). Combat (3). Organisational. This article examines findings about Gendered violence which was reported on substantially more than the other categories; the act of silencing women’s voice and experience was highest here when the author was male. The “Skype Affair” attracted considerable media attention and whilst reporting did not sensationalise violence against women, reporters engaged in journalistic devices that diminished the perpetrator/s role whilst positioning the victim centrally; using“hijacking” maneuvers to prioritise stories about men, omit women’s agency, and provide a smokescreen to conceal the dysfunction of institutional gendered violence within the military.Feminism and feminist commentary was poorly represented, providing no meaningful contribution within the sample. We conclude that the focus on women as sexual beings and victims in the print media in Australia reproduces stereotypes of gender roles that create and perpetuate gender inequalities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalFeminist Media Studies
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 01 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

print media
Fires
Military
gender
violence
gender role
structural violence
reporter
feminism
stereotype
content analysis
news
Violence
Print Media
Portrayal
Gender Roles
experience

Cite this

@article{0ce0a5abf5304876bd3425220b08f1cb,
title = "Gender under fire: Portrayals of military women in the Australian print media",
abstract = "The news media is historically recognised for producing and reinforcing gendered norms and binaries. Correspondingly militaries are institutions where gender roles and expectations create contention. We conducted a content analysis of two Australian broadsheets; the Australian and the Sydney Morning Herald. We investigated how military women were represented between1997 and 2017, exploring three categories (1). Gendered violence(2). Combat (3). Organisational. This article examines findings about Gendered violence which was reported on substantially more than the other categories; the act of silencing women’s voice and experience was highest here when the author was male. The “Skype Affair” attracted considerable media attention and whilst reporting did not sensationalise violence against women, reporters engaged in journalistic devices that diminished the perpetrator/s role whilst positioning the victim centrally; using“hijacking” maneuvers to prioritise stories about men, omit women’s agency, and provide a smokescreen to conceal the dysfunction of institutional gendered violence within the military.Feminism and feminist commentary was poorly represented, providing no meaningful contribution within the sample. We conclude that the focus on women as sexual beings and victims in the print media in Australia reproduces stereotypes of gender roles that create and perpetuate gender inequalities.",
author = "Donna Bridges and Ben Wadham",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14680777.2019.1592208",
language = "English",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Feminist Media Studies",
issn = "1468-0777",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Gender under fire : Portrayals of military women in the Australian print media. / Bridges, Donna; Wadham, Ben.

In: Feminist Media Studies, 01.04.2019, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender under fire

T2 - Portrayals of military women in the Australian print media

AU - Bridges, Donna

AU - Wadham, Ben

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - The news media is historically recognised for producing and reinforcing gendered norms and binaries. Correspondingly militaries are institutions where gender roles and expectations create contention. We conducted a content analysis of two Australian broadsheets; the Australian and the Sydney Morning Herald. We investigated how military women were represented between1997 and 2017, exploring three categories (1). Gendered violence(2). Combat (3). Organisational. This article examines findings about Gendered violence which was reported on substantially more than the other categories; the act of silencing women’s voice and experience was highest here when the author was male. The “Skype Affair” attracted considerable media attention and whilst reporting did not sensationalise violence against women, reporters engaged in journalistic devices that diminished the perpetrator/s role whilst positioning the victim centrally; using“hijacking” maneuvers to prioritise stories about men, omit women’s agency, and provide a smokescreen to conceal the dysfunction of institutional gendered violence within the military.Feminism and feminist commentary was poorly represented, providing no meaningful contribution within the sample. We conclude that the focus on women as sexual beings and victims in the print media in Australia reproduces stereotypes of gender roles that create and perpetuate gender inequalities.

AB - The news media is historically recognised for producing and reinforcing gendered norms and binaries. Correspondingly militaries are institutions where gender roles and expectations create contention. We conducted a content analysis of two Australian broadsheets; the Australian and the Sydney Morning Herald. We investigated how military women were represented between1997 and 2017, exploring three categories (1). Gendered violence(2). Combat (3). Organisational. This article examines findings about Gendered violence which was reported on substantially more than the other categories; the act of silencing women’s voice and experience was highest here when the author was male. The “Skype Affair” attracted considerable media attention and whilst reporting did not sensationalise violence against women, reporters engaged in journalistic devices that diminished the perpetrator/s role whilst positioning the victim centrally; using“hijacking” maneuvers to prioritise stories about men, omit women’s agency, and provide a smokescreen to conceal the dysfunction of institutional gendered violence within the military.Feminism and feminist commentary was poorly represented, providing no meaningful contribution within the sample. We conclude that the focus on women as sexual beings and victims in the print media in Australia reproduces stereotypes of gender roles that create and perpetuate gender inequalities.

U2 - 10.1080/14680777.2019.1592208

DO - 10.1080/14680777.2019.1592208

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Feminist Media Studies

JF - Feminist Media Studies

SN - 1468-0777

ER -