Globalization and the Politics of Indigeneity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Indigenous peoples inevitably associate globalization with imperial expansion and the colonization of their territories. One associated scholarly view is that globalization's focus on capital accumulation sets aside indigenous cultural priorities to undermine self-determining authority over lands and resources (Fenelon and Hall, 2008; Friedman, 1999; Kelsey 2005a; 2005b; Stewart-Harawira, 2005). Alternatively, globalization is an ambiguous paradox also providing significant benefits to indigenous peoples. In two very different Pacific countries, Fiji and New Zealand, the globalization of political and jurisprudential thought on the rights of indigeneity provides a significant counter to state assertions of absolute sovereignty. Globalization creates economic opportunities to reduce indigenous dependence on the state and in its contemporary expression is less significant than domestic factors in inhibiting indigenous aspirations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)637-650
Number of pages14
JournalGlobalizations
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

globalization
politics
set-aside
capital accumulation
sovereignty
Melanesia
colonization
New Zealand
Globalization
resource
economics
resources
Indigenous peoples

Cite this

@article{4e3bae72fce74ff695e517d1cbaae525,
title = "Globalization and the Politics of Indigeneity",
abstract = "Indigenous peoples inevitably associate globalization with imperial expansion and the colonization of their territories. One associated scholarly view is that globalization's focus on capital accumulation sets aside indigenous cultural priorities to undermine self-determining authority over lands and resources (Fenelon and Hall, 2008; Friedman, 1999; Kelsey 2005a; 2005b; Stewart-Harawira, 2005). Alternatively, globalization is an ambiguous paradox also providing significant benefits to indigenous peoples. In two very different Pacific countries, Fiji and New Zealand, the globalization of political and jurisprudential thought on the rights of indigeneity provides a significant counter to state assertions of absolute sovereignty. Globalization creates economic opportunities to reduce indigenous dependence on the state and in its contemporary expression is less significant than domestic factors in inhibiting indigenous aspirations.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Globalization, Indigeneity, Sovereignty",
author = "Dominic O'Sullivan",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = October, 2012; Journal title (773t) = Globalizations. ISSNs: 1474-7731;",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1080/14747731.2012.732424",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "637--650",
journal = "Globalizations",
issn = "1474-7731",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "5",

}

Globalization and the Politics of Indigeneity. / O'Sullivan, Dominic.

In: Globalizations, Vol. 9, No. 5, 10.2012, p. 637-650.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Globalization and the Politics of Indigeneity

AU - O'Sullivan, Dominic

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = October, 2012; Journal title (773t) = Globalizations. ISSNs: 1474-7731;

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Indigenous peoples inevitably associate globalization with imperial expansion and the colonization of their territories. One associated scholarly view is that globalization's focus on capital accumulation sets aside indigenous cultural priorities to undermine self-determining authority over lands and resources (Fenelon and Hall, 2008; Friedman, 1999; Kelsey 2005a; 2005b; Stewart-Harawira, 2005). Alternatively, globalization is an ambiguous paradox also providing significant benefits to indigenous peoples. In two very different Pacific countries, Fiji and New Zealand, the globalization of political and jurisprudential thought on the rights of indigeneity provides a significant counter to state assertions of absolute sovereignty. Globalization creates economic opportunities to reduce indigenous dependence on the state and in its contemporary expression is less significant than domestic factors in inhibiting indigenous aspirations.

AB - Indigenous peoples inevitably associate globalization with imperial expansion and the colonization of their territories. One associated scholarly view is that globalization's focus on capital accumulation sets aside indigenous cultural priorities to undermine self-determining authority over lands and resources (Fenelon and Hall, 2008; Friedman, 1999; Kelsey 2005a; 2005b; Stewart-Harawira, 2005). Alternatively, globalization is an ambiguous paradox also providing significant benefits to indigenous peoples. In two very different Pacific countries, Fiji and New Zealand, the globalization of political and jurisprudential thought on the rights of indigeneity provides a significant counter to state assertions of absolute sovereignty. Globalization creates economic opportunities to reduce indigenous dependence on the state and in its contemporary expression is less significant than domestic factors in inhibiting indigenous aspirations.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Globalization

KW - Indigeneity

KW - Sovereignty

U2 - 10.1080/14747731.2012.732424

DO - 10.1080/14747731.2012.732424

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 637

EP - 650

JO - Globalizations

JF - Globalizations

SN - 1474-7731

IS - 5

ER -