Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Harmonizing platelet function analyzer testing and reporting in a large laboratory network

  • Emmanuel J Favaloro
  • , Soma Mohammed
  • , Ronny Vong
  • , Kent Chapman
  • , Geoffrey Kershaw
  • , Sarah Just
  • , Lynne Connelly
  • , Michael Ryan
  • , Diane Zebeljan
  • , Timothy Brighton
  • , Leonardo Pasalic
  • Westmead Hospital
  • Sydney Centres for Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research (ICPMR)
  • John Hunter Hospital
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
  • Royal North Shore Hospital
  • Wollongong Hospital
  • Liverpool Hospital
  • Prince of Wales Hospital
  • The University of Sydney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The platelet function analyzer (PFA) is a popular platelet function screening instrument, highly sensitive to von Willebrand disease (VWD) and to aspirin therapy, with moderate sensitivity to defects in platelet function and/or deficiencies in platelet number. There are two models, the original PFA-100 and the contemporary PFA-200. Normal reference ranges (NRRs) provided by the manufacturer are the same for both models, instead being based on the type of test cartridge, for which there are two main ones: collagen/epinephrine (C/Epi) and collagen/adenosine diphosphate (C/ADP).
METHODS: Comparative evaluations of PFA testing and reporting in six different sites of a large pathology network, aiming to harmonize NRRs and test reporting across all network sites. A separate comparative study of testing a range of samples (n > 150) on a PFA-100 versus that on a PFA-200. Review of contemporary literature.
RESULTS: Each site was identified to have a different reporting NRR, which after consolidating data permitted establishment of an agreed harmonized NRR for use across the network (C/Epi: 90-160; C/ADP: 70-124; based on n > 180). Similarly, each site reported and interpreted results in different ways, and after discussion and consolidation, a harmonized approach to interpretation and reporting was achieved. The separate comparative study of PFA-100 versus PFA-200 testing confirmed instrument equivalence.
CONCLUSION: We achieved harmonized NRRs and reporting for PFA testing across a large pathology network. Our approach may be useful for other laboratory networks wishing to harmonize PFA testing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)934-944
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Laboratory Hematology
Volume44
Issue number5
Early online date26 Jun 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Harmonizing platelet function analyzer testing and reporting in a large laboratory network'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this