Hobbes Against the Jurists: Sovereignty and Artificial Reason

Lawrence May

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper discusses sovereignty and examines in detail Hobbes's debates with the two leading legal theorists of his day, Coke and Hale, both Lord Chief Justices of the King's Bench. I argue that Hobbes came to change his mind somewhat about the desirability of divided sovereignty by the time, near the end of his life, that he wrote the Dialogue. But I also argue that Hobbes should have developed more than a very thin conception of the rule of law. Hobbes should have been more open to the ideas that the jurists of his day were developing, especially the idea that the judiciary should have independent status.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)223-232
    Number of pages10
    JournalHobbes Studies
    Volume25
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Hobbes Against the Jurists: Sovereignty and Artificial Reason'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this