How can the social sciences work with ecology in informing feral horse policy and management in south-eastern Australia?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Feral horse management is a complex social issue. Committed and active stakeholders hold strong beliefs regarding both the level of culling needed and humane approaches to control. Ecological evidence supporting control and expert advice on ethical culling can, in such contexts, have limited effect in policy development and application. Given this complexity, social scientists have an important role to play in developing longer term solutions. Three possible approaches are evident: the use of knowledge exchange and boundary spanning expertise; the proactive development of publicly available evidence-informed narratives; and the development of influence and leadership at the science–policy interface. Social scientists, ecologists, managers and policymakers need to work together to develop and implement sound management decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-12
Number of pages4
JournalEcological Management and Restoration
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

culling
social sciences
horse
ecology
horses
development policy
leadership
ecologists
policy development
stakeholders
managers
stakeholder
social science
policy
decision
effect
advice

Cite this

@article{a832ea554c2d4e848050dacd71dd8df8,
title = "How can the social sciences work with ecology in informing feral horse policy and management in south-eastern Australia?",
abstract = "Feral horse management is a complex social issue. Committed and active stakeholders hold strong beliefs regarding both the level of culling needed and humane approaches to control. Ecological evidence supporting control and expert advice on ethical culling can, in such contexts, have limited effect in policy development and application. Given this complexity, social scientists have an important role to play in developing longer term solutions. Three possible approaches are evident: the use of knowledge exchange and boundary spanning expertise; the proactive development of publicly available evidence-informed narratives; and the development of influence and leadership at the science–policy interface. Social scientists, ecologists, managers and policymakers need to work together to develop and implement sound management decisions.",
keywords = "Alpine, Brumby, leadership, narratives, research impact, science–policy interface",
author = "Knight, {Alexandra R.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/emr.12366",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "9--12",
journal = "Ecological Management and Restoration",
issn = "1442-7001",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How can the social sciences work with ecology in informing feral horse policy and management in south-eastern Australia?

AU - Knight, Alexandra R.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Feral horse management is a complex social issue. Committed and active stakeholders hold strong beliefs regarding both the level of culling needed and humane approaches to control. Ecological evidence supporting control and expert advice on ethical culling can, in such contexts, have limited effect in policy development and application. Given this complexity, social scientists have an important role to play in developing longer term solutions. Three possible approaches are evident: the use of knowledge exchange and boundary spanning expertise; the proactive development of publicly available evidence-informed narratives; and the development of influence and leadership at the science–policy interface. Social scientists, ecologists, managers and policymakers need to work together to develop and implement sound management decisions.

AB - Feral horse management is a complex social issue. Committed and active stakeholders hold strong beliefs regarding both the level of culling needed and humane approaches to control. Ecological evidence supporting control and expert advice on ethical culling can, in such contexts, have limited effect in policy development and application. Given this complexity, social scientists have an important role to play in developing longer term solutions. Three possible approaches are evident: the use of knowledge exchange and boundary spanning expertise; the proactive development of publicly available evidence-informed narratives; and the development of influence and leadership at the science–policy interface. Social scientists, ecologists, managers and policymakers need to work together to develop and implement sound management decisions.

KW - Alpine

KW - Brumby

KW - leadership

KW - narratives

KW - research impact

KW - science–policy interface

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060848881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060848881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/emr.12366

DO - 10.1111/emr.12366

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 9

EP - 12

JO - Ecological Management and Restoration

JF - Ecological Management and Restoration

SN - 1442-7001

IS - 1

ER -