Abstract
I respond to Hörnle and Kremnitzer via a brief review of the development of our modern concept of human dignity, in which I take issue with their account of human dignity as non-humiliation, preferring instead the language of non-degradation. In addition, I offer a different account of the role of human dignity in criminal law, not as a criminally protected interest but as a foundational value.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 169-183 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Israel Law Review |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Humiliation, Degradation, and Moral Capacity: A Response to Hörnle and Kremnitzer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver