TY - JOUR
T1 - Hybrid neoliberalism
T2 - Implications for sustainable development
AU - Baldwin, Claudia
AU - Marshall, Graham
AU - Ross, Helen
AU - Cavaye, Jim
AU - Stephenson, Janet
AU - Carter, Lyn
AU - Freeman, Claire
AU - Curtis, Allan
AU - Syme, Geoff
N1 - Includes bibliographical references.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Neoliberalism is frequently blamed for challenges in achieving sustainable development; consequently some also question if sustainability is still a useful concept. Neoliberal influence on natural resource management has evolved over the last 30 years to a hybrid form that seeks to compensate for its negative social and environmental externalities. Through review of literature and critical analysis of three case studies of resource development in Australia and New Zealand, we argue that, in spite of modifications under hybrid approaches, neoliberalism still tests achievement of sustainability goals, due to privileging industry and shifting risk and costs to future generations, through inadequate regulation, neglect of public consultation, lack of transparency, and weak impact assessment. We suggest that while neoliberal approaches bring both benefits and disadvantages, sustainability principles must continue to be kept at the forefront of legislation, regulation and management.
AB - Neoliberalism is frequently blamed for challenges in achieving sustainable development; consequently some also question if sustainability is still a useful concept. Neoliberal influence on natural resource management has evolved over the last 30 years to a hybrid form that seeks to compensate for its negative social and environmental externalities. Through review of literature and critical analysis of three case studies of resource development in Australia and New Zealand, we argue that, in spite of modifications under hybrid approaches, neoliberalism still tests achievement of sustainability goals, due to privileging industry and shifting risk and costs to future generations, through inadequate regulation, neglect of public consultation, lack of transparency, and weak impact assessment. We suggest that while neoliberal approaches bring both benefits and disadvantages, sustainability principles must continue to be kept at the forefront of legislation, regulation and management.
KW - Coal seam gas
KW - Hybrid neoliberalism
KW - Indigenous
KW - Offshore mining
KW - Water allocation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062629469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062629469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08941920.2018.1556758
DO - 10.1080/08941920.2018.1556758
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85062629469
SN - 0894-1920
VL - 32
SP - 566
EP - 587
JO - Society and Natural Resources
JF - Society and Natural Resources
IS - 5
ER -