TY - JOUR
T1 - Hype, evidence gaps and digital divides
T2 - Telehealth blind spots in rural Australia
AU - Warr, Deborah
AU - Luscombe, Georgina
AU - Couch, Danielle
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
Includes bibliographical references
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Despite high unmet demand for health services across rural Australia, uptake of telehealth has been slow, piecemeal and ad hoc. We argue that widespread failure to understand telehealth as a socio-technical practice is key to understanding this slow progress. To develop this argument, we explore how technocentric approaches to telehealth have contributed to critical blind spots. First, the ‘hype’ associated with the technological possibilities of telehealth discourages thoughtful consideration of the unanticipated consequences when technologies are rolled out into complex social fields. Second, it contributes to critical gaps in the telehealth evidence base, and particularly a paucity of analyses focussing on the experiences of service users and patients. A third blind spot concerns the limited attention paid to the social determinants of health and digital divides in rural areas. The final blind spot we consider is an apparent reluctance to engage community stakeholders in co-designing and coproducing telehealth services. We used an iterative approach to identify studies and commentary from a range of academic fields to explain the significance of the telehealth blind spots and how they might be addressed. Insights suggest how expanding understanding of the social dimensions of telehealth could enhance its accessibility, effectiveness and responsiveness to community needs and contexts.
AB - Despite high unmet demand for health services across rural Australia, uptake of telehealth has been slow, piecemeal and ad hoc. We argue that widespread failure to understand telehealth as a socio-technical practice is key to understanding this slow progress. To develop this argument, we explore how technocentric approaches to telehealth have contributed to critical blind spots. First, the ‘hype’ associated with the technological possibilities of telehealth discourages thoughtful consideration of the unanticipated consequences when technologies are rolled out into complex social fields. Second, it contributes to critical gaps in the telehealth evidence base, and particularly a paucity of analyses focussing on the experiences of service users and patients. A third blind spot concerns the limited attention paid to the social determinants of health and digital divides in rural areas. The final blind spot we consider is an apparent reluctance to engage community stakeholders in co-designing and coproducing telehealth services. We used an iterative approach to identify studies and commentary from a range of academic fields to explain the significance of the telehealth blind spots and how they might be addressed. Insights suggest how expanding understanding of the social dimensions of telehealth could enhance its accessibility, effectiveness and responsiveness to community needs and contexts.
KW - issues in research methodology
KW - social inequalities in health
KW - technology in healthcare
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120401238&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120401238&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/13634593211060763
DO - 10.1177/13634593211060763
M3 - Article
C2 - 34818943
AN - SCOPUS:85120401238
SN - 1363-4593
VL - 27
SP - 588
EP - 606
JO - Health (United Kingdom)
JF - Health (United Kingdom)
IS - 4
ER -