Identifying thresholds and ceilings in plant community recovery for optimal management of widespread weeds

F. Dane Panetta, Luke O'Loughlin, Ben Gooden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A substantial body of work underlies the theory and practice of early intervention in the management of invasive alien plants, but less attention has been paid to the strategic management of widespread weeds, especially in the context of natural asset recovery. The assumption lingers amongst some researchers and land managers that removing weeds will automatically lead to positive biodiversity outcomes, with the more weed removed, the better the outcome. However, this is often not the case, particularly for long-established weed species whose dominance has created impoverished communities with little capacity for passive recovery. A common result may be wasted investment in weed control and, in the extreme, net negative impacts upon asset values. We present a conceptual model for the management of weed-impacted assets, plus guidance for its application, with a view to improving asset recovery practice. Weed removal should be calibrated by asset recovery, which may mean not seeking to completely remove a weed at a given spatial scale. Our model focusses on weed removal that is enough to initiate asset recovery, but not more than is necessary to promote maximum expression of asset resilience, particularly in the context of secondary invasions. Optimal management efficiency will involve a proportional allocation of resources to control, monitoring and revegetation activities that is appropriate to the stage of asset recovery, as well as a willingness to revise a management goal if the original one cannot be achieved within existing constraints on resources.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-18
JournalNeoBiota
Volume42
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

assets
weed
weed control
plant community
plant communities
weeds
revegetation
introduced plants
land restoration
resource allocation
resource
managers
researchers
biodiversity
monitoring

Cite this

@article{e8ba5cc4df5e41a58fbee54bf2671f89,
title = "Identifying thresholds and ceilings in plant community recovery for optimal management of widespread weeds",
abstract = "A substantial body of work underlies the theory and practice of early intervention in the management of invasive alien plants, but less attention has been paid to the strategic management of widespread weeds, especially in the context of natural asset recovery. The assumption lingers amongst some researchers and land managers that removing weeds will automatically lead to positive biodiversity outcomes, with the more weed removed, the better the outcome. However, this is often not the case, particularly for long-established weed species whose dominance has created impoverished communities with little capacity for passive recovery. A common result may be wasted investment in weed control and, in the extreme, net negative impacts upon asset values. We present a conceptual model for the management of weed-impacted assets, plus guidance for its application, with a view to improving asset recovery practice. Weed removal should be calibrated by asset recovery, which may mean not seeking to completely remove a weed at a given spatial scale. Our model focusses on weed removal that is enough to initiate asset recovery, but not more than is necessary to promote maximum expression of asset resilience, particularly in the context of secondary invasions. Optimal management efficiency will involve a proportional allocation of resources to control, monitoring and revegetation activities that is appropriate to the stage of asset recovery, as well as a willingness to revise a management goal if the original one cannot be achieved within existing constraints on resources.",
keywords = "Biodiversity, natural assest recovery, resilience, resistance, secondary invasion, weed management",
author = "Panetta, {F. Dane} and Luke O'Loughlin and Ben Gooden",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.3897/neobiota.42.30797",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "NeoBiota",
issn = "1314-2488",
publisher = "Pensoft Publishers",

}

Identifying thresholds and ceilings in plant community recovery for optimal management of widespread weeds. / Panetta, F. Dane; O'Loughlin, Luke; Gooden, Ben.

In: NeoBiota, Vol. 42, 2019, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying thresholds and ceilings in plant community recovery for optimal management of widespread weeds

AU - Panetta, F. Dane

AU - O'Loughlin, Luke

AU - Gooden, Ben

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - A substantial body of work underlies the theory and practice of early intervention in the management of invasive alien plants, but less attention has been paid to the strategic management of widespread weeds, especially in the context of natural asset recovery. The assumption lingers amongst some researchers and land managers that removing weeds will automatically lead to positive biodiversity outcomes, with the more weed removed, the better the outcome. However, this is often not the case, particularly for long-established weed species whose dominance has created impoverished communities with little capacity for passive recovery. A common result may be wasted investment in weed control and, in the extreme, net negative impacts upon asset values. We present a conceptual model for the management of weed-impacted assets, plus guidance for its application, with a view to improving asset recovery practice. Weed removal should be calibrated by asset recovery, which may mean not seeking to completely remove a weed at a given spatial scale. Our model focusses on weed removal that is enough to initiate asset recovery, but not more than is necessary to promote maximum expression of asset resilience, particularly in the context of secondary invasions. Optimal management efficiency will involve a proportional allocation of resources to control, monitoring and revegetation activities that is appropriate to the stage of asset recovery, as well as a willingness to revise a management goal if the original one cannot be achieved within existing constraints on resources.

AB - A substantial body of work underlies the theory and practice of early intervention in the management of invasive alien plants, but less attention has been paid to the strategic management of widespread weeds, especially in the context of natural asset recovery. The assumption lingers amongst some researchers and land managers that removing weeds will automatically lead to positive biodiversity outcomes, with the more weed removed, the better the outcome. However, this is often not the case, particularly for long-established weed species whose dominance has created impoverished communities with little capacity for passive recovery. A common result may be wasted investment in weed control and, in the extreme, net negative impacts upon asset values. We present a conceptual model for the management of weed-impacted assets, plus guidance for its application, with a view to improving asset recovery practice. Weed removal should be calibrated by asset recovery, which may mean not seeking to completely remove a weed at a given spatial scale. Our model focusses on weed removal that is enough to initiate asset recovery, but not more than is necessary to promote maximum expression of asset resilience, particularly in the context of secondary invasions. Optimal management efficiency will involve a proportional allocation of resources to control, monitoring and revegetation activities that is appropriate to the stage of asset recovery, as well as a willingness to revise a management goal if the original one cannot be achieved within existing constraints on resources.

KW - Biodiversity

KW - natural assest recovery

KW - resilience

KW - resistance

KW - secondary invasion

KW - weed management

U2 - 10.3897/neobiota.42.30797

DO - 10.3897/neobiota.42.30797

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - NeoBiota

JF - NeoBiota

SN - 1314-2488

ER -