Implementing an interactive oral task to assess undergraduate psychology students' attainment of pre-professional competencies

Finding engaging and authentic ways to assess required competencies which are resistant to academic misconduct is a challenge for tertiary psychology education. While simulation-based tasks are commonly used to assess postgraduate students’ development of professional competencies, they are less commonly used in undergraduate programs to assess preprofessional competencies. Interactive oral assessments have been suggested to achieve
authenticity while inhibiting academic misconduct, and to be feasible within an online learning environment. The current study presents students’ and markers’ perceptions of an interactive oral task implemented to assess fourth-year psychology students’ counselling and reflection skills. Results suggest that students and markers perceived the interactive oral task to be an authentic assessment of knowledge and skills required for future practice, which encouraged deeper learning than written assessments or exams, and was resistant to academic misconduct. Despite feeling anxious about the new assessment format, both students and markers reported finding the engaging nature of the task enjoyable and indicated that they would like to be involved in more interactive oral assessments in the future. The extent to which these findings reflect the current literature, and the role for interactive oral tasks in the innovative, authentic assessment of pre-professional competencies which promote academic integrity are discussed.