Importance of welfare and ethics competence regarding animals kept for scientific purposes to veterinary students in Australia and New Zealand

Teresa Collins, Amelia Cornish, Jennifer Hood, Chris Degeling, Andrew D. Fisher, Rafael Freire, Susan J. Hazel, Jane Johnson, Janice K.F. Lloyd, Clive J. Phillips, Vicky Tzioumis, Paul D. McGreevy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Veterinarians are in a strong position of social influence on animal-related issues. Hence, veterinary schools have an opportunity to raise animal health and welfare standards by improving veterinary students' animal welfare and ethics (AWE) education, including that related to animals used for scientific purposes. A survey of 818 students in the early, mid, and senior stages of their courses at all eight veterinary schools across Australia and New Zealand was undertaken on their first day of practice (or Day One Competences) to explore how veterinary students viewed the importance of their competence in the management of welfare and ethical decision-making relating to animals kept for scientific purposes. From highest to lowest, the rankings they assigned were: Animal Ethics Committee (AEC) Procedures or Requirements; 3Rs (Replacement, Refinement and Reduction); Humane Endpoints; Euthanasia; "What Is a Research Animal?" and Conscientious Objections. Female students rated Conscientious Objections, Humane Endpoints, and Euthanasia significantly higher than male students did across the three stages of study. The score patterns for these three variates showed a trend for the male students to be more likely to score these topics as extremely important as they advanced through the course, but female students' scores tended to decline slightly or stay relatively stable. No gender differences emerged for the three variates: 3Rs (Replacement, Refinement and Reduction); AEC Procedures or Requirements; and "What Is a Research Animal?". This study demonstrates that understandings of the regulatory and normative frameworks are considered most important in animal welfare and ethics competence in veterinary students. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to investigate what importance veterinary students place on their competence regarding animals kept for scientific purposes.
Original languageEnglish
Article number66
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalVeterinary Sciences
Volume5
Issue number3
Early online date14 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

ethics
New Zealand
Ethics
Mental Competency
veterinarians
Students
students
humane endpoints
animal welfare
Animal Welfare
animals
euthanasia
Veterinary Schools
Animal Care Committees
committees
laboratory animals
Euthanasia
animal health
gender differences
decision making

Cite this

Collins, Teresa ; Cornish, Amelia ; Hood, Jennifer ; Degeling, Chris ; Fisher, Andrew D. ; Freire, Rafael ; Hazel, Susan J. ; Johnson, Jane ; Lloyd, Janice K.F. ; Phillips, Clive J. ; Tzioumis, Vicky ; McGreevy, Paul D. / Importance of welfare and ethics competence regarding animals kept for scientific purposes to veterinary students in Australia and New Zealand. In: Veterinary Sciences. 2018 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 1-14.
@article{443771a7ecea43c5bde109ad85b7f62d,
title = "Importance of welfare and ethics competence regarding animals kept for scientific purposes to veterinary students in Australia and New Zealand",
abstract = "Veterinarians are in a strong position of social influence on animal-related issues. Hence, veterinary schools have an opportunity to raise animal health and welfare standards by improving veterinary students' animal welfare and ethics (AWE) education, including that related to animals used for scientific purposes. A survey of 818 students in the early, mid, and senior stages of their courses at all eight veterinary schools across Australia and New Zealand was undertaken on their first day of practice (or Day One Competences) to explore how veterinary students viewed the importance of their competence in the management of welfare and ethical decision-making relating to animals kept for scientific purposes. From highest to lowest, the rankings they assigned were: Animal Ethics Committee (AEC) Procedures or Requirements; 3Rs (Replacement, Refinement and Reduction); Humane Endpoints; Euthanasia; {"}What Is a Research Animal?{"} and Conscientious Objections. Female students rated Conscientious Objections, Humane Endpoints, and Euthanasia significantly higher than male students did across the three stages of study. The score patterns for these three variates showed a trend for the male students to be more likely to score these topics as extremely important as they advanced through the course, but female students' scores tended to decline slightly or stay relatively stable. No gender differences emerged for the three variates: 3Rs (Replacement, Refinement and Reduction); AEC Procedures or Requirements; and {"}What Is a Research Animal?{"}. This study demonstrates that understandings of the regulatory and normative frameworks are considered most important in animal welfare and ethics competence in veterinary students. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to investigate what importance veterinary students place on their competence regarding animals kept for scientific purposes.",
keywords = "3Rs, Animal welfare, Conscientious objection, Day One Competence, Euthanasia, Gender, Humane endpoint, Research animals, Veterinary education, Veterinary ethics",
author = "Teresa Collins and Amelia Cornish and Jennifer Hood and Chris Degeling and Fisher, {Andrew D.} and Rafael Freire and Hazel, {Susan J.} and Jane Johnson and Lloyd, {Janice K.F.} and Phillips, {Clive J.} and Vicky Tzioumis and McGreevy, {Paul D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/vetsci5030066",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Veterinary Sciences",
issn = "2306-7381",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "3",

}

Collins, T, Cornish, A, Hood, J, Degeling, C, Fisher, AD, Freire, R, Hazel, SJ, Johnson, J, Lloyd, JKF, Phillips, CJ, Tzioumis, V & McGreevy, PD 2018, 'Importance of welfare and ethics competence regarding animals kept for scientific purposes to veterinary students in Australia and New Zealand', Veterinary Sciences, vol. 5, no. 3, 66, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5030066

Importance of welfare and ethics competence regarding animals kept for scientific purposes to veterinary students in Australia and New Zealand. / Collins, Teresa; Cornish, Amelia; Hood, Jennifer; Degeling, Chris; Fisher, Andrew D.; Freire, Rafael; Hazel, Susan J.; Johnson, Jane; Lloyd, Janice K.F.; Phillips, Clive J.; Tzioumis, Vicky; McGreevy, Paul D.

In: Veterinary Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 3, 66, 01.09.2018, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Importance of welfare and ethics competence regarding animals kept for scientific purposes to veterinary students in Australia and New Zealand

AU - Collins, Teresa

AU - Cornish, Amelia

AU - Hood, Jennifer

AU - Degeling, Chris

AU - Fisher, Andrew D.

AU - Freire, Rafael

AU - Hazel, Susan J.

AU - Johnson, Jane

AU - Lloyd, Janice K.F.

AU - Phillips, Clive J.

AU - Tzioumis, Vicky

AU - McGreevy, Paul D.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Veterinarians are in a strong position of social influence on animal-related issues. Hence, veterinary schools have an opportunity to raise animal health and welfare standards by improving veterinary students' animal welfare and ethics (AWE) education, including that related to animals used for scientific purposes. A survey of 818 students in the early, mid, and senior stages of their courses at all eight veterinary schools across Australia and New Zealand was undertaken on their first day of practice (or Day One Competences) to explore how veterinary students viewed the importance of their competence in the management of welfare and ethical decision-making relating to animals kept for scientific purposes. From highest to lowest, the rankings they assigned were: Animal Ethics Committee (AEC) Procedures or Requirements; 3Rs (Replacement, Refinement and Reduction); Humane Endpoints; Euthanasia; "What Is a Research Animal?" and Conscientious Objections. Female students rated Conscientious Objections, Humane Endpoints, and Euthanasia significantly higher than male students did across the three stages of study. The score patterns for these three variates showed a trend for the male students to be more likely to score these topics as extremely important as they advanced through the course, but female students' scores tended to decline slightly or stay relatively stable. No gender differences emerged for the three variates: 3Rs (Replacement, Refinement and Reduction); AEC Procedures or Requirements; and "What Is a Research Animal?". This study demonstrates that understandings of the regulatory and normative frameworks are considered most important in animal welfare and ethics competence in veterinary students. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to investigate what importance veterinary students place on their competence regarding animals kept for scientific purposes.

AB - Veterinarians are in a strong position of social influence on animal-related issues. Hence, veterinary schools have an opportunity to raise animal health and welfare standards by improving veterinary students' animal welfare and ethics (AWE) education, including that related to animals used for scientific purposes. A survey of 818 students in the early, mid, and senior stages of their courses at all eight veterinary schools across Australia and New Zealand was undertaken on their first day of practice (or Day One Competences) to explore how veterinary students viewed the importance of their competence in the management of welfare and ethical decision-making relating to animals kept for scientific purposes. From highest to lowest, the rankings they assigned were: Animal Ethics Committee (AEC) Procedures or Requirements; 3Rs (Replacement, Refinement and Reduction); Humane Endpoints; Euthanasia; "What Is a Research Animal?" and Conscientious Objections. Female students rated Conscientious Objections, Humane Endpoints, and Euthanasia significantly higher than male students did across the three stages of study. The score patterns for these three variates showed a trend for the male students to be more likely to score these topics as extremely important as they advanced through the course, but female students' scores tended to decline slightly or stay relatively stable. No gender differences emerged for the three variates: 3Rs (Replacement, Refinement and Reduction); AEC Procedures or Requirements; and "What Is a Research Animal?". This study demonstrates that understandings of the regulatory and normative frameworks are considered most important in animal welfare and ethics competence in veterinary students. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to investigate what importance veterinary students place on their competence regarding animals kept for scientific purposes.

KW - 3Rs

KW - Animal welfare

KW - Conscientious objection

KW - Day One Competence

KW - Euthanasia

KW - Gender

KW - Humane endpoint

KW - Research animals

KW - Veterinary education

KW - Veterinary ethics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053631337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053631337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/vetsci5030066

DO - 10.3390/vetsci5030066

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Veterinary Sciences

JF - Veterinary Sciences

SN - 2306-7381

IS - 3

M1 - 66

ER -