In defence of necessity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper disputes Uwe Steinhoff’s view that a jus ad bellum requirement of necessity can be merged with a condition of proportionality. It argues that the proposed merger detracts from a conceptual and moral understanding of the structure and rationale of both the necessity and the proportionality considerations applicable in a range of moral contexts, including those of war and so-called lesser evils cases, where these conditions are intended as action-guiding.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2317-2325
Number of pages9
JournalPhilosophia (United States)
Volume51
Issue number5
Early online dateAug 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In defence of necessity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this