In defence of the precautionary principle

    Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperConference paper

    Abstract

    The precautionary principle is widely advocated, especially in Europe, but also much attacked. In this paper the principle will first be outlined and then some of the common criticisms discussed. One in particular will be examined in some depth; the criticism is that it is inherently paradoxical. The paradox supposedly arises because if the principle is applied to some action that is potentially harmful, it should also be applied to that application of it which is also potentially harmful, because it stops an action that is beneficial. Here it will be argued that the precautionary principle is not paradoxical and that it is important and useful.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationISTAS 2010
    Subtitle of host publicationSocial implications of emerging technologies
    EditorsIEEE Staff
    Place of PublicationPiscataway
    PublisherIEEE
    Pages42-47
    Number of pages6
    ISBN (Electronic)9781424477777
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010
    EventInternational Symposium on Technology and Society - Wollongong, NSW, Australia
    Duration: 07 Jun 201009 Jun 2010

    Conference

    ConferenceInternational Symposium on Technology and Society
    CountryAustralia
    Period07/06/1009/06/10

    Fingerprint

    Precautionary Principle
    Criticism
    Paradox

    Cite this

    Weckert, J. (2010). In defence of the precautionary principle. In IEEE. Staff (Ed.), ISTAS 2010: Social implications of emerging technologies (pp. 42-47). Piscataway: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2010.5514653
    Weckert, John. / In defence of the precautionary principle. ISTAS 2010: Social implications of emerging technologies. editor / IEEE Staff. Piscataway : IEEE, 2010. pp. 42-47
    @inproceedings{77143dd3077c45bcbd3fa75c6764f9be,
    title = "In defence of the precautionary principle",
    abstract = "The precautionary principle is widely advocated, especially in Europe, but also much attacked. In this paper the principle will first be outlined and then some of the common criticisms discussed. One in particular will be examined in some depth; the criticism is that it is inherently paradoxical. The paradox supposedly arises because if the principle is applied to some action that is potentially harmful, it should also be applied to that application of it which is also potentially harmful, because it stops an action that is beneficial. Here it will be argued that the precautionary principle is not paradoxical and that it is important and useful.",
    keywords = "Precautionary principle",
    author = "John Weckert",
    note = "Imported on 03 May 2017 - DigiTool details were: publisher = Piscataway: IEEE, 2010. editor/s (773b) = IEEE Staff; Event dates (773o) = 7-9 June 2010; Parent title (773t) = International Symposium on Technology and Society.",
    year = "2010",
    doi = "10.1109/ISTAS.2010.5514653",
    language = "English",
    pages = "42--47",
    editor = "IEEE Staff",
    booktitle = "ISTAS 2010",
    publisher = "IEEE",

    }

    Weckert, J 2010, In defence of the precautionary principle. in IEEE Staff (ed.), ISTAS 2010: Social implications of emerging technologies. IEEE, Piscataway, pp. 42-47, International Symposium on Technology and Society, Australia, 07/06/10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2010.5514653

    In defence of the precautionary principle. / Weckert, John.

    ISTAS 2010: Social implications of emerging technologies. ed. / IEEE Staff. Piscataway : IEEE, 2010. p. 42-47.

    Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperConference paper

    TY - GEN

    T1 - In defence of the precautionary principle

    AU - Weckert, John

    N1 - Imported on 03 May 2017 - DigiTool details were: publisher = Piscataway: IEEE, 2010. editor/s (773b) = IEEE Staff; Event dates (773o) = 7-9 June 2010; Parent title (773t) = International Symposium on Technology and Society.

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - The precautionary principle is widely advocated, especially in Europe, but also much attacked. In this paper the principle will first be outlined and then some of the common criticisms discussed. One in particular will be examined in some depth; the criticism is that it is inherently paradoxical. The paradox supposedly arises because if the principle is applied to some action that is potentially harmful, it should also be applied to that application of it which is also potentially harmful, because it stops an action that is beneficial. Here it will be argued that the precautionary principle is not paradoxical and that it is important and useful.

    AB - The precautionary principle is widely advocated, especially in Europe, but also much attacked. In this paper the principle will first be outlined and then some of the common criticisms discussed. One in particular will be examined in some depth; the criticism is that it is inherently paradoxical. The paradox supposedly arises because if the principle is applied to some action that is potentially harmful, it should also be applied to that application of it which is also potentially harmful, because it stops an action that is beneficial. Here it will be argued that the precautionary principle is not paradoxical and that it is important and useful.

    KW - Precautionary principle

    U2 - 10.1109/ISTAS.2010.5514653

    DO - 10.1109/ISTAS.2010.5514653

    M3 - Conference paper

    SP - 42

    EP - 47

    BT - ISTAS 2010

    A2 - Staff, IEEE

    PB - IEEE

    CY - Piscataway

    ER -

    Weckert J. In defence of the precautionary principle. In Staff IEEE, editor, ISTAS 2010: Social implications of emerging technologies. Piscataway: IEEE. 2010. p. 42-47 https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2010.5514653