Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 137-150 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Anthropological Quarterly |
| Volume | 78 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
In Memoriam : Jacques Derrida (1930-2004). / Fleming, Christopher; O'Carroll, John.
In: Anthropological Quarterly, Vol. 78, No. 1, 2005, p. 137-150.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - In Memoriam
T2 - Jacques Derrida (1930-2004)
AU - Fleming, Christopher
AU - O'Carroll, John
N1 - Imported on 10 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Anthropological Quarterly. ISSNs: 0003-5491;
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Chris Fleming and John O'Carroll - In Memoriam: Jacques Derrida (1930-2004) - Anthropological Quarterly 78:1 Anthropological Quarterly 78.1 (2005) 137-150 In Memoriam: Jacques Derrida (1930-2004) Chris Fleming University of Western Sydney, Australia John O'Carroll Charles Sturt University, Australia Philosophy and Anthropology Late in 1998, replying to a question from Catherine Paoletti, the philosopher, Jacques Derrida was asked to reflect on aspects of his own early life. He remarked on his own decision to write in the first place that it was for him A form of resistance, of retreat. In this journal I kept (as a youth), there were things that were at once autobiographical and personal, but also, already sketches of little works on Rousseau and Nietzsche. In this regard, I very well remember this debate within myself: I sought to reconcile them; I admired both of them equally. I knew that Nietzsche was a merciless critic of Rousseau, and I asked myself how one could be Nietzschean and Rousseauist at the same time, as I was to become, finally (Derrida 2000: 18) The claim appears strange. In the usual philosophical terms, Derrida's debt to Nietzsche and Rousseau is very slight. His work stands in the phenomenological-methodological tradition of Edmund Husserl. This is especially true of innovations like deconstruction. In a stylistic sense, Derrida had little of Nietzsche's confrontational literary verve and perhaps even less of Rousseau's astonishing...
AB - Chris Fleming and John O'Carroll - In Memoriam: Jacques Derrida (1930-2004) - Anthropological Quarterly 78:1 Anthropological Quarterly 78.1 (2005) 137-150 In Memoriam: Jacques Derrida (1930-2004) Chris Fleming University of Western Sydney, Australia John O'Carroll Charles Sturt University, Australia Philosophy and Anthropology Late in 1998, replying to a question from Catherine Paoletti, the philosopher, Jacques Derrida was asked to reflect on aspects of his own early life. He remarked on his own decision to write in the first place that it was for him A form of resistance, of retreat. In this journal I kept (as a youth), there were things that were at once autobiographical and personal, but also, already sketches of little works on Rousseau and Nietzsche. In this regard, I very well remember this debate within myself: I sought to reconcile them; I admired both of them equally. I knew that Nietzsche was a merciless critic of Rousseau, and I asked myself how one could be Nietzschean and Rousseauist at the same time, as I was to become, finally (Derrida 2000: 18) The claim appears strange. In the usual philosophical terms, Derrida's debt to Nietzsche and Rousseau is very slight. His work stands in the phenomenological-methodological tradition of Edmund Husserl. This is especially true of innovations like deconstruction. In a stylistic sense, Derrida had little of Nietzsche's confrontational literary verve and perhaps even less of Rousseau's astonishing...
U2 - 10.1353/anq.2005.0009
DO - 10.1353/anq.2005.0009
M3 - Article
VL - 78
SP - 137
EP - 150
JO - Anthropological Quarterly
JF - Anthropological Quarterly
SN - 0003-5491
IS - 1
ER -