Increasing the value and efficiency of herbicide resistance surveys

Caleb C. Squires, Guy R.Y. Coleman, John C. Broster, Christopher Preston, Peter Boutsalis, Mechelle J. Owen, Adam Jalaludin, Michael J. Walsh

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)


The scale of herbicide resistance within a cropping region can be estimated and monitored using surveys of weed populations. The current approach to herbicide resistance surveys is time-consuming, logistically challenging and costly. Here we review past and current approaches used in herbicide resistance surveys with the aims of (i) defining effective survey methodologies, (ii) highlighting opportunities for improving efficiencies through the use of new technologies and (iii) identifying the value of repeated region-wide herbicide resistance surveys. One of the most extensively surveyed areas of the world's cropping regions is the Australian grain production region, with >2900 fields randomly surveyed in each of three surveys conducted over the past 15 years. Consequently, recommended methodologies are based on what has been learned from the Australian experience. Traditional seedling-based herbicide screening assays remain the most reliable and widely applicable method for characterizing resistance in weed populations. The use of satellite or aerial imagery to plan collections and image analysis to rapidly quantify screening results could complement traditional resistance assays by increasing survey efficiency and sampling accuracy. Global management of herbicide-resistant weeds would benefit from repeated and standardized surveys that track herbicide resistance evolution within and across cropping regions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3881-3889
Number of pages9
JournalPest Management Science
Issue number9
Early online date01 Mar 2021
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2021


Dive into the research topics of 'Increasing the value and efficiency of herbicide resistance surveys'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this