Infection prevention and control

Who is the judge, you or the guidelines?

Stephane L. Bouchoucha, Kathleen A. Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the attitudes and behaviours of registered nurses and their colleagues around the adoption of standard precautions in order to determine strategies to promote adherence. Design: A qualitative exploratory descriptive design used interviews and focus group to collect data. Setting: Registered nurses and registered midwifes from a tertiary metropolitan hospital took part in the study. Participants: A voluntary sample of 29 adults was recruited from the Australian nursing (n = 25) and midwifery (n = 4) workforce. There were six men (mean age = 36.83 years; SD = 8.93) and 23 women (mean age = 41.36 years; SD = 10.25). Participants were recruited through advertisement on notice boards and emails from unit managers. Results: Thematic analysis revealed five themes but the focus here is on staff judgements which are against the guidelines. Participants indicated that where in their judgement the patient posed no risk and they judged themselves skilled in the procedure, they were justified in deviating from the guidelines. Some staff judgements appeared to be self-protecting, while others were irrational and inconsistent. Conclusions: Despite use of standard precautions being mandated, staff often deviated from them based on their own assessment of the situation or the patient. Any deviance from the guidelines is of concern but especially so when staff take it upon themselves to apply their own criteria or judgements. These results also suggest there may be some organisational inadequacies with regards to training and supervision of staff.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-137
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Infection Prevention
Volume19
Issue number3
Early online date03 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 May 2018

Fingerprint

Infection Control
Guidelines
Nurses
Nurse Midwives
Urban Hospitals
Midwifery
Focus Groups
Tertiary Care Centers
Nursing
Interviews

Cite this

@article{672cfeb8e2564463a1ab58285c7c1ede,
title = "Infection prevention and control: Who is the judge, you or the guidelines?",
abstract = "Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the attitudes and behaviours of registered nurses and their colleagues around the adoption of standard precautions in order to determine strategies to promote adherence. Design: A qualitative exploratory descriptive design used interviews and focus group to collect data. Setting: Registered nurses and registered midwifes from a tertiary metropolitan hospital took part in the study. Participants: A voluntary sample of 29 adults was recruited from the Australian nursing (n = 25) and midwifery (n = 4) workforce. There were six men (mean age = 36.83 years; SD = 8.93) and 23 women (mean age = 41.36 years; SD = 10.25). Participants were recruited through advertisement on notice boards and emails from unit managers. Results: Thematic analysis revealed five themes but the focus here is on staff judgements which are against the guidelines. Participants indicated that where in their judgement the patient posed no risk and they judged themselves skilled in the procedure, they were justified in deviating from the guidelines. Some staff judgements appeared to be self-protecting, while others were irrational and inconsistent. Conclusions: Despite use of standard precautions being mandated, staff often deviated from them based on their own assessment of the situation or the patient. Any deviance from the guidelines is of concern but especially so when staff take it upon themselves to apply their own criteria or judgements. These results also suggest there may be some organisational inadequacies with regards to training and supervision of staff.",
keywords = "Attitudes, Behaviour, Infection prevention, Judgement, Nursing, Qualitative, Standard precautions",
author = "Bouchoucha, {Stephane L.} and Moore, {Kathleen A.}",
note = "Includes bibliographical references.",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1757177417738332",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "131--137",
journal = "Journal of Infection Prevention",
issn = "1757-1774",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Infection prevention and control : Who is the judge, you or the guidelines? / Bouchoucha, Stephane L.; Moore, Kathleen A.

In: Journal of Infection Prevention, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. 131-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Infection prevention and control

T2 - Who is the judge, you or the guidelines?

AU - Bouchoucha, Stephane L.

AU - Moore, Kathleen A.

N1 - Includes bibliographical references.

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the attitudes and behaviours of registered nurses and their colleagues around the adoption of standard precautions in order to determine strategies to promote adherence. Design: A qualitative exploratory descriptive design used interviews and focus group to collect data. Setting: Registered nurses and registered midwifes from a tertiary metropolitan hospital took part in the study. Participants: A voluntary sample of 29 adults was recruited from the Australian nursing (n = 25) and midwifery (n = 4) workforce. There were six men (mean age = 36.83 years; SD = 8.93) and 23 women (mean age = 41.36 years; SD = 10.25). Participants were recruited through advertisement on notice boards and emails from unit managers. Results: Thematic analysis revealed five themes but the focus here is on staff judgements which are against the guidelines. Participants indicated that where in their judgement the patient posed no risk and they judged themselves skilled in the procedure, they were justified in deviating from the guidelines. Some staff judgements appeared to be self-protecting, while others were irrational and inconsistent. Conclusions: Despite use of standard precautions being mandated, staff often deviated from them based on their own assessment of the situation or the patient. Any deviance from the guidelines is of concern but especially so when staff take it upon themselves to apply their own criteria or judgements. These results also suggest there may be some organisational inadequacies with regards to training and supervision of staff.

AB - Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the attitudes and behaviours of registered nurses and their colleagues around the adoption of standard precautions in order to determine strategies to promote adherence. Design: A qualitative exploratory descriptive design used interviews and focus group to collect data. Setting: Registered nurses and registered midwifes from a tertiary metropolitan hospital took part in the study. Participants: A voluntary sample of 29 adults was recruited from the Australian nursing (n = 25) and midwifery (n = 4) workforce. There were six men (mean age = 36.83 years; SD = 8.93) and 23 women (mean age = 41.36 years; SD = 10.25). Participants were recruited through advertisement on notice boards and emails from unit managers. Results: Thematic analysis revealed five themes but the focus here is on staff judgements which are against the guidelines. Participants indicated that where in their judgement the patient posed no risk and they judged themselves skilled in the procedure, they were justified in deviating from the guidelines. Some staff judgements appeared to be self-protecting, while others were irrational and inconsistent. Conclusions: Despite use of standard precautions being mandated, staff often deviated from them based on their own assessment of the situation or the patient. Any deviance from the guidelines is of concern but especially so when staff take it upon themselves to apply their own criteria or judgements. These results also suggest there may be some organisational inadequacies with regards to training and supervision of staff.

KW - Attitudes

KW - Behaviour

KW - Infection prevention

KW - Judgement

KW - Nursing

KW - Qualitative

KW - Standard precautions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046798137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046798137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1757177417738332

DO - 10.1177/1757177417738332

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 131

EP - 137

JO - Journal of Infection Prevention

JF - Journal of Infection Prevention

SN - 1757-1774

IS - 3

ER -