Influence of production method on the sensory profile and consumer acceptance of Australian sparkling white wine styles

Julie A. Culbert, R. Ristic, L. A. Ovington, A. J. Saliba, Kerry L Wilkinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Aims: There is considerable diversity amongst the styles of sparkling white wine produced in Australia, from relatively simple, fruit-forward sparkling wines to those that exhibit complexity due to yeast autolysis and ageing. This study profiled the sensory characteristics and quality of sparkling white wines made via the different methods of production (carbonation, Charmat, transfer and Méthode Traditionelle) and determined consumer preferences for Australian sparkling white wine styles. Methods and Results: The sensory profiles and quality ratings of 50 Australian sparkling white wines were determined by descriptive analysis and expert panels, respectively. A subset of wines representative of the variation observed in sensory profiles, comprising two Méthode Traditionelle wines, two transfer wines, a Charmat wine and a carbonated wine, were subsequently selected for preference testing to determine consumer liking. Conclusions: The production method strongly influenced the sensory profile, and therefore quality, of the sparkling white wines studied. Mean hedonic ratings ranged from 4.1 to 5.1 (on a 9 cm scale), with the Charmat wine liked the most; however, segmentation based on consumers' individual liking scores identified four consumer clusters with preferences for distinct styles of sparkling white wine. Significance of the Study: This is the first study to profile the stylistic variation amongst Australian sparkling white wines and, importantly, to determine consumer preferences for different styles of sparkling wine. Research findings enable industry to understand better the preferences of different segments of the consumer market for sparkling wine.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-178
Number of pages9
JournalAustralian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
Volume23
Issue number2
Early online dateApr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

sparkling wines
consumer acceptance
white wines
wines
methodology
consumer preferences
fruit wines
carbonation
autolysis
sensory properties

Cite this

@article{4c98699f2b0745bf9f2a0de34b6043f0,
title = "Influence of production method on the sensory profile and consumer acceptance of Australian sparkling white wine styles",
abstract = "Background and Aims: There is considerable diversity amongst the styles of sparkling white wine produced in Australia, from relatively simple, fruit-forward sparkling wines to those that exhibit complexity due to yeast autolysis and ageing. This study profiled the sensory characteristics and quality of sparkling white wines made via the different methods of production (carbonation, Charmat, transfer and M{\'e}thode Traditionelle) and determined consumer preferences for Australian sparkling white wine styles. Methods and Results: The sensory profiles and quality ratings of 50 Australian sparkling white wines were determined by descriptive analysis and expert panels, respectively. A subset of wines representative of the variation observed in sensory profiles, comprising two M{\'e}thode Traditionelle wines, two transfer wines, a Charmat wine and a carbonated wine, were subsequently selected for preference testing to determine consumer liking. Conclusions: The production method strongly influenced the sensory profile, and therefore quality, of the sparkling white wines studied. Mean hedonic ratings ranged from 4.1 to 5.1 (on a 9 cm scale), with the Charmat wine liked the most; however, segmentation based on consumers' individual liking scores identified four consumer clusters with preferences for distinct styles of sparkling white wine. Significance of the Study: This is the first study to profile the stylistic variation amongst Australian sparkling white wines and, importantly, to determine consumer preferences for different styles of sparkling wine. Research findings enable industry to understand better the preferences of different segments of the consumer market for sparkling wine.",
keywords = "consumer preference, descriptive analysis, principal component analysis, sparkling wine, wine quality",
author = "Culbert, {Julie A.} and R. Ristic and Ovington, {L. A.} and Saliba, {A. J.} and Wilkinson, {Kerry L}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ajgw.12277",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "170--178",
journal = "Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research",
issn = "1322-7130",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Influence of production method on the sensory profile and consumer acceptance of Australian sparkling white wine styles. / Culbert, Julie A.; Ristic, R.; Ovington, L. A.; Saliba, A. J.; Wilkinson, Kerry L.

In: Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, Vol. 23, No. 2, 01.06.2017, p. 170-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of production method on the sensory profile and consumer acceptance of Australian sparkling white wine styles

AU - Culbert, Julie A.

AU - Ristic, R.

AU - Ovington, L. A.

AU - Saliba, A. J.

AU - Wilkinson, Kerry L

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Background and Aims: There is considerable diversity amongst the styles of sparkling white wine produced in Australia, from relatively simple, fruit-forward sparkling wines to those that exhibit complexity due to yeast autolysis and ageing. This study profiled the sensory characteristics and quality of sparkling white wines made via the different methods of production (carbonation, Charmat, transfer and Méthode Traditionelle) and determined consumer preferences for Australian sparkling white wine styles. Methods and Results: The sensory profiles and quality ratings of 50 Australian sparkling white wines were determined by descriptive analysis and expert panels, respectively. A subset of wines representative of the variation observed in sensory profiles, comprising two Méthode Traditionelle wines, two transfer wines, a Charmat wine and a carbonated wine, were subsequently selected for preference testing to determine consumer liking. Conclusions: The production method strongly influenced the sensory profile, and therefore quality, of the sparkling white wines studied. Mean hedonic ratings ranged from 4.1 to 5.1 (on a 9 cm scale), with the Charmat wine liked the most; however, segmentation based on consumers' individual liking scores identified four consumer clusters with preferences for distinct styles of sparkling white wine. Significance of the Study: This is the first study to profile the stylistic variation amongst Australian sparkling white wines and, importantly, to determine consumer preferences for different styles of sparkling wine. Research findings enable industry to understand better the preferences of different segments of the consumer market for sparkling wine.

AB - Background and Aims: There is considerable diversity amongst the styles of sparkling white wine produced in Australia, from relatively simple, fruit-forward sparkling wines to those that exhibit complexity due to yeast autolysis and ageing. This study profiled the sensory characteristics and quality of sparkling white wines made via the different methods of production (carbonation, Charmat, transfer and Méthode Traditionelle) and determined consumer preferences for Australian sparkling white wine styles. Methods and Results: The sensory profiles and quality ratings of 50 Australian sparkling white wines were determined by descriptive analysis and expert panels, respectively. A subset of wines representative of the variation observed in sensory profiles, comprising two Méthode Traditionelle wines, two transfer wines, a Charmat wine and a carbonated wine, were subsequently selected for preference testing to determine consumer liking. Conclusions: The production method strongly influenced the sensory profile, and therefore quality, of the sparkling white wines studied. Mean hedonic ratings ranged from 4.1 to 5.1 (on a 9 cm scale), with the Charmat wine liked the most; however, segmentation based on consumers' individual liking scores identified four consumer clusters with preferences for distinct styles of sparkling white wine. Significance of the Study: This is the first study to profile the stylistic variation amongst Australian sparkling white wines and, importantly, to determine consumer preferences for different styles of sparkling wine. Research findings enable industry to understand better the preferences of different segments of the consumer market for sparkling wine.

KW - consumer preference

KW - descriptive analysis

KW - principal component analysis

KW - sparkling wine

KW - wine quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017545314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017545314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ajgw.12277

DO - 10.1111/ajgw.12277

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 170

EP - 178

JO - Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research

JF - Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research

SN - 1322-7130

IS - 2

ER -