Abstract
| Language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 0-0 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Applied Cognitive Psychology |
| State | Published - 2020 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Information Gathering in Law-Enforcement : Interview Practice by HUMINT and Criminal Investigators. / Goodman-Delahunty, Jane; Sivasubramaniam, Diane; Gumbert, Thea.
In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2020, p. 0-0.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Information Gathering in Law-Enforcement
T2 - Applied Cognitive Psychology
AU - Goodman-Delahunty,Jane
AU - Sivasubramaniam,Diane
AU - Gumbert,Thea
N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Applied Cognitive Psychology. ISSNs: 1099-0720;
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Law enforcement interviews are conducted for multiple purposes, but little research exists on their perceived effectiveness. An online survey examined 73 interviewing practices of 324 intelligence and criminal investigators. Participants reported more commonalities than differences; all preferred a cooperative, information-gathering approach and rated rapport-building as highly effective in securing true and accurate information, although HUMINT practitioners gave more emphasis to the latter. Both groups of practitioners relied on procedural justice approaches of kindness, respect, genuine concern, and addressed basic needs of interviewees to build rapport. They favoured noncoercive techniques to point out testimonial inconsistencies and present evidence to interviewees. HUMINT interviewers were more likely than criminal investigators to conduct interviews in informal, comfortable settings, to establish identities in common with and to become a lifeline to their sources, and to offer them tangible and intangible rewards for cooperation.
AB - Law enforcement interviews are conducted for multiple purposes, but little research exists on their perceived effectiveness. An online survey examined 73 interviewing practices of 324 intelligence and criminal investigators. Participants reported more commonalities than differences; all preferred a cooperative, information-gathering approach and rated rapport-building as highly effective in securing true and accurate information, although HUMINT practitioners gave more emphasis to the latter. Both groups of practitioners relied on procedural justice approaches of kindness, respect, genuine concern, and addressed basic needs of interviewees to build rapport. They favoured noncoercive techniques to point out testimonial inconsistencies and present evidence to interviewees. HUMINT interviewers were more likely than criminal investigators to conduct interviews in informal, comfortable settings, to establish identities in common with and to become a lifeline to their sources, and to offer them tangible and intangible rewards for cooperation.
M3 - Article
SP - 0
EP - 0
JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology
JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology
SN - 0888-4080
ER -