Informed Consent and Surgeons' Performance

Stephen Clarke, Justin Oakley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

50 Citations (Scopus)


This paper argues that the provision of effective informed consent by surgical patients requires the disclosure of material information about the comparative clinical performance of available surgeons. We develop a new ethical argument for the conclusion that comparative information about surgeons' performance ' surgeons' report cards ' should be provided to patients, a conclusion that has already been supported by legal and economic arguments. We consider some recent institutional and legal developments in this area, and we respond to some common objections to the use of report cards on the clinical performance of surgeons.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-35
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Medicine and Philosophy
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2004


Dive into the research topics of 'Informed Consent and Surgeons' Performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this