Informing and implementing policy to advance mental health and wellbeing through action research in a rural remote community mental health setting

Eileen Petrie, Timothy Schultz, Alan Pearson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to work collaboratively with a rural Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) to examine the issue of workplace stress and address issues specified by the group.

METHOD: A five stage action research method following the Susman and Evered Model of Change was implemented for this research with four distinct cycles completed.

RESULTS: A cyclic process of action research established that organizational policies, clinical skills and educational levels of staff were inadequate. Two overarching themes drove the research cycles: staff safety and inadequate education of nursing staff to assess and appropriately manage consumers with mental health issues.

CONCLUSIONS: This study found that unsafe environmental conditions in the health workplace and limited staff knowledge contributed to workplace stress. Staff identified as vital strategies to manage aggressive or potentially aggressive incidents effectively and ensure staff and client safety. Managers, policy makers and government officials need awareness of the threats to healthy workforces. Tools to guide practice and staff education were implemented to address the identified problems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S112-5
JournalAustralasian Psychiatry
Volume17 Suppl 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Informing and implementing policy to advance mental health and wellbeing through action research in a rural remote community mental health setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this