Innovative grassland management systems for environmental and livelihood benefits

David Kemp, GD Han, XY. Hou, David Michalk, FJ. Hou, Jianping Wu, YJ. Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Grasslands occupy 40% of the world'€™s land surface (excluding Antarcticaand Greenland) and support diverse groups, from traditionalextensive nomadic to intense livestock-production systems. Populationpressuresmean thatmany of these grasslands are in a degradedstate, particularly in less-productive areas of developing countries,affecting not only productivity but also vital environmental servicessuch as hydrology, biodiversity, andcarbon cycles; livestock conditionis often poor and household incomes are at or below poverty levels.The challenge is to optimize management practices that result in“win-winâ€� outcomes for grasslands, the environment, and households.A case study is discussed from northwestern China, where ithas been possible to reduce animal numbers considerably by usinganenergy-balance/market-based approach while improving householdincomes, providing conditions within which grassland recoveryis possible. This bottom-up approach was supported by informingand working with the six layers of government in China to buildappropriate policies. Further policy implications are considered. Additionalgains in grassland rehabilitation could be fostered throughtargeted environmental payment schemes. Other aspects of the livestockproduction system that can be modified are discussed. Thiswork built a strategy that has implications for many other grasslandareas around the world where common problems apply.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8369-8374
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume110
Issue number21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

grassland
bottom-up approach
livestock farming
household income
production system
livestock
land surface
management practice
poverty
hydrology
developing world
livelihood
biodiversity
productivity
market
animal
policy
world

Cite this

Kemp, David ; Han, GD ; Hou, XY. ; Michalk, David ; Hou, FJ. ; Wu, Jianping ; Zhang, YJ. / Innovative grassland management systems for environmental and livelihood benefits. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013 ; Vol. 110, No. 21. pp. 8369-8374.
@article{ad3c6cfb77214a8f95e2c6d14e1498c8,
title = "Innovative grassland management systems for environmental and livelihood benefits",
abstract = "Grasslands occupy 40{\%} of the world'{\^A}€{\^A}™s land surface (excluding Antarcticaand Greenland) and support diverse groups, from traditionalextensive nomadic to intense livestock-production systems. Populationpressuresmean thatmany of these grasslands are in a degradedstate, particularly in less-productive areas of developing countries,affecting not only productivity but also vital environmental servicessuch as hydrology, biodiversity, andcarbon cycles; livestock conditionis often poor and household incomes are at or below poverty levels.The challenge is to optimize management practices that result in{\~A}¢{\^A}€{\^A}œwin-win{\~A}¢{\^A}€{\^A}� outcomes for grasslands, the environment, and households.A case study is discussed from northwestern China, where ithas been possible to reduce animal numbers considerably by usinganenergy-balance/market-based approach while improving householdincomes, providing conditions within which grassland recoveryis possible. This bottom-up approach was supported by informingand working with the six layers of government in China to buildappropriate policies. Further policy implications are considered. Additionalgains in grassland rehabilitation could be fostered throughtargeted environmental payment schemes. Other aspects of the livestockproduction system that can be modified are discussed. Thiswork built a strategy that has implications for many other grasslandareas around the world where common problems apply.",
keywords = "Grassland degradation, Herder",
author = "David Kemp and GD Han and XY. Hou and David Michalk and FJ. Hou and Jianping Wu and YJ. Zhang",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = May, 2013; Journal title (773t) = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. ISSNs: 1091-6490;",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1208063110",
language = "English",
volume = "110",
pages = "8369--8374",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
publisher = "National Academy of Sciences",
number = "21",

}

Innovative grassland management systems for environmental and livelihood benefits. / Kemp, David; Han, GD; Hou, XY.; Michalk, David; Hou, FJ.; Wu, Jianping; Zhang, YJ.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 110, No. 21, 05.2013, p. 8369-8374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Innovative grassland management systems for environmental and livelihood benefits

AU - Kemp, David

AU - Han, GD

AU - Hou, XY.

AU - Michalk, David

AU - Hou, FJ.

AU - Wu, Jianping

AU - Zhang, YJ.

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = May, 2013; Journal title (773t) = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. ISSNs: 1091-6490;

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - Grasslands occupy 40% of the world'€™s land surface (excluding Antarcticaand Greenland) and support diverse groups, from traditionalextensive nomadic to intense livestock-production systems. Populationpressuresmean thatmany of these grasslands are in a degradedstate, particularly in less-productive areas of developing countries,affecting not only productivity but also vital environmental servicessuch as hydrology, biodiversity, andcarbon cycles; livestock conditionis often poor and household incomes are at or below poverty levels.The challenge is to optimize management practices that result in“win-winâ€� outcomes for grasslands, the environment, and households.A case study is discussed from northwestern China, where ithas been possible to reduce animal numbers considerably by usinganenergy-balance/market-based approach while improving householdincomes, providing conditions within which grassland recoveryis possible. This bottom-up approach was supported by informingand working with the six layers of government in China to buildappropriate policies. Further policy implications are considered. Additionalgains in grassland rehabilitation could be fostered throughtargeted environmental payment schemes. Other aspects of the livestockproduction system that can be modified are discussed. Thiswork built a strategy that has implications for many other grasslandareas around the world where common problems apply.

AB - Grasslands occupy 40% of the world'€™s land surface (excluding Antarcticaand Greenland) and support diverse groups, from traditionalextensive nomadic to intense livestock-production systems. Populationpressuresmean thatmany of these grasslands are in a degradedstate, particularly in less-productive areas of developing countries,affecting not only productivity but also vital environmental servicessuch as hydrology, biodiversity, andcarbon cycles; livestock conditionis often poor and household incomes are at or below poverty levels.The challenge is to optimize management practices that result in“win-winâ€� outcomes for grasslands, the environment, and households.A case study is discussed from northwestern China, where ithas been possible to reduce animal numbers considerably by usinganenergy-balance/market-based approach while improving householdincomes, providing conditions within which grassland recoveryis possible. This bottom-up approach was supported by informingand working with the six layers of government in China to buildappropriate policies. Further policy implications are considered. Additionalgains in grassland rehabilitation could be fostered throughtargeted environmental payment schemes. Other aspects of the livestockproduction system that can be modified are discussed. Thiswork built a strategy that has implications for many other grasslandareas around the world where common problems apply.

KW - Grassland degradation

KW - Herder

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1208063110

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1208063110

M3 - Article

C2 - 23671092

VL - 110

SP - 8369

EP - 8374

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 21

ER -